Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Trouble finding battery with proper ledge


mvliotta

Recommended Posts

I own a  2007 cooper S Turbo I replaced my battery with a DEKA AGM

(purchased through a local DEKA distributor) The overall length of that group 47 is less than the OEM battery and I am considering one for my car (non tii) to get the AGM.

If you go to DEKA website catalog and select that year cooper with 1598 cc you will get the turbo model and dimensions.  I may go this route or the 26R . The Dead OEM Battery I had a hard time tucking into the tray as a trial due to the length; which is why this replacement seems better. 

 

DEKA 9AGM47

image.thumb.png.e277d31e879f23c5b72d131f4e1d3e00.png

 

Edited by mgben
more data
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, 7502 said:

Not Lithium, but still much lighter and thinner than what was in there before. Hold down is a work in progress but hasn't moved anywhere yet. Can't seem to remember the size code for it right now. 

 

image.png.11d05129d1ce09f921af5e4f6d1ee4d9.png

 

 

When I autocrossed I was required to strap my battery in so I used a roof rack strap which I had in the trunk. It's still on there, even though the battery has the shelf. In the '71 I picked up last Fall the battery didn't have a shelf and it was just sloppin' around. I did same thing with a roof rack strap and it is quite secure. 

 

But the above belt-usage is definitely the high-grade way to go! Real leather :)

--

'73 Sahara numbers matching 

'74 Mintgrun sunroof car w/ oem Golde deflector, euro bumpers, 5spd, owned since 2002

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/7/2019 at 4:38 AM, Conserv said:

I believe the Exide Classic 26RC remains available. It’s the right size for a tii and has a shelf for the factory hold-down on the short end.  It’s just....expensive, nearly $300 for a new one (plus shipping, I gather from Vince’s research).

 

The second photo shows the battery in my ‘73 when it still had its sticker, removed in the first photo.

 

Regards,

 

Steve

 

The feet on the end of the 26RC are too high up the battery for the factory tray and hold down. They can be found for under a hundres dollars though. I’ve done quite a bit of research on the subject...

46D026B1-0807-4D52-83F1-B789DF8A579A.jpeg

Edited by tjones02
  • Like 1

Tom Jones

BMW mechanic for over 25 years, BMWCCA since 1984
66 BMW16oo stored, 67 1600-2 lifelong project, 2 more 67-8 1600s, 86 528e 5sp 585k, 91 318i
Mom&Dad's, 65 1800TiSA, 70 2800, 72 2002Tii 2760007 orig owners, 15 Z4 N20

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, mgben said:

I own a  2007 cooper S Turbo I replaced my battery with a DEKA AGM

(purchased through a local DEKA distributor) The overall length of that group 47 is less than the OEM battery and I am considering one for my car (non tii) to get the AGM.

If you go to DEKA website catalog and select that year cooper with 1598 cc you will get the turbo model and dimensions.  I may go this route or the 26R . The Dead OEM Battery I had a hard time tucking into the tray as a trial due to the length; which is why this replacement seems better. 

 

DEKA 9AGM47

image.thumb.png.e277d31e879f23c5b72d131f4e1d3e00.png

 

 

While the Group 47 is the preferred replacement for the R56 Minis and regular 2002s and ‘74 Tii’s. And, it may be smaller than the optional factory installed Mini batteries, it is much larger than the standard original Mini batteries, which are the same size as the original 2002tii batteries.

 

And... When you upgraded to an AGM battery in your Mini, did you have the car reprogramed to know that it now has an AGM battery? And or, did you have the new battery registered to the car? These generation Mini, and BMWs, require that whenever a new battery is installed that the car’s computer be told that, so that it’s computer controlled alternator can charge the new battery accordingly. These cars charge an ild battery differently than a new one and can, and will, overcharge a new battery. Especially a new AGM battery that shouldn’t be charged with the 16 Volts that these cars alternators can put out... The car is likely still also programed for a standard lead acid battery and will overcharge that AGM....

 

Our ‘02s old school alternators/voltage regulators don’t usually charge over 15 Volts, so there’s no worry in using AGM batteries there.

Edited by tjones02
  • Thanks 1

Tom Jones

BMW mechanic for over 25 years, BMWCCA since 1984
66 BMW16oo stored, 67 1600-2 lifelong project, 2 more 67-8 1600s, 86 528e 5sp 585k, 91 318i
Mom&Dad's, 65 1800TiSA, 70 2800, 72 2002Tii 2760007 orig owners, 15 Z4 N20

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/8/2019 at 10:47 AM, tjones02 said:

 

The feet on the end of the 26RC are too high up the battery for the factory tray and hold down. They can be found for under a hundres dollars though. I’ve done quite a bit of research on the subject...

46D026B1-0807-4D52-83F1-B789DF8A579A.jpeg

 

Hi, Tom,

 

My Exide Classic 26RC, fits my ‘73 tii’s battery tray and hold down. No modifications were needed.  Could they have “updated” the battery case after my battery was produced? Mine is a 2014. And...my ‘73’s nosepiece has been replaced (with a tii unit, surprisingly), so I suppose the tray could have been accidentally altered (or altered by an accident ?)....

 

Best regards,

 

Steve

 

2BC20123-B6D1-442D-8870-FB8FAA44929A.jpeg

2744A9A4-47FA-48DA-89C1-14B0769A760D.jpeg

 

1976 2002 Polaris, 2742541 (original owner)

1973 2002tii Inka, 2762757 (not-the-original owner)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Conserv said:

 

Hi, Tom,

 

My Exide Classic 26RC, fits my ‘73’s battery tray and hold down. No modifications were needed.  Could they have “updated” the battery case after my battery was produced? Mine is a 2014. And...my ‘73’s nosepiece has been replaced (with a tii unit, however), so I suppose the tray could have been accidentally altered....

 

Best regards,

 

Steve

 

 

Are you sure the foot tucks under the ledge in the battery tray? I say, only because I’ve measured and tried many many batteries including the 26RC.

Tom Jones

BMW mechanic for over 25 years, BMWCCA since 1984
66 BMW16oo stored, 67 1600-2 lifelong project, 2 more 67-8 1600s, 86 528e 5sp 585k, 91 318i
Mom&Dad's, 65 1800TiSA, 70 2800, 72 2002Tii 2760007 orig owners, 15 Z4 N20

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tjones02 said:

 

While the Group 47 is the preferred replacement for the R56 Minis and regular 2002s and ‘74 Tii’s. And, it may be smaller than the optional factory installed Mini batteries, it is much larger than the standard original Mini batteries, which are the same size as the original 2002tii batteries.

 

And... When you upgraded to an AGM battery in your Mini, did you have the car reprogramed to know that it now has an AGM battery? And or, did you have the new battery registered to the car? These generation Mini, and BMWs, require that whenever a new battery is installed that the car’s computer be told that, so that it’s computer controlled alternator can charge the new battery accordingly. These cars charge an ild battery differently than a new one and can, and will, overcharge a new battery. Especially a new AGM battery that shouldn’t be charged with the 16 Volts that these cars alternators can put out... The car is likely still also programed for a standard lead acid battery and will overcharge that AGM....

 

Our ‘02s old school alternators/voltage regulators don’t usually charge over 15 Volts, so there’s no worry in using AGM batteries there.

Everywhere that I looked I found that my new to me, no battery 74 tii used a group 26r - but the battery tray looked a lot bigger. So is a group 47 the right battery for a 74 tii? 

Koboldtopf - '67 1600-2

Einhorn - '74 tii

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, tjones02 said:

 

Are you sure the foot tucks under the ledge in the battery tray? I say, only because I’ve measured and tried many many batteries including the 26RC.

 

I can’t say for certain, Tom. And the car is in a friend’s warehouse in Pennsylvania. I’ll have to look next time I visit. I know the battery is tight in there, but I can’t positively confirm the foot tucks under the ledge.

 

Best regards,

 

Steve

 

 

Edited by Conserv

1976 2002 Polaris, 2742541 (original owner)

1973 2002tii Inka, 2762757 (not-the-original owner)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve found new production batteries often have changed to eliminate those important ledges. Ran into this shopping for ‘66 Mustang battery, too. 

 

There are only a couple manufacturers left in the US, so maybe JCI or whomever is doing this to us. 

 

Greg

January 30, 1973 Agave tii

April 24, 1974 Chamonix Turbo (German delivery)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, tjones02 said:

 

 

And... When you upgraded to an AGM battery in your Mini, did you have the car reprogramed to know that it now has an AGM battery? And or, did you have the new battery registered to the car? These generation Mini, and BMWs, require that whenever a new battery is installed that the car’s computer be told that, so that it’s computer controlled alternator can charge the new battery accordingly. These cars charge an ild battery differently than a new one and can, and will, overcharge a new battery. Especially a new AGM battery that shouldn’t be charged with the 16 Volts that these cars alternators can put out... The car is likely still also programed for a standard lead acid battery and will overcharge that AGM....

 

 

I've read about this and my understanding is that the charging system on the newer cars runs more of a charge/discharge routine for a couple reasons.

One being that the alternators are higher-output, and higher-output alternators reportedly charge less at low speeds than lower output alternators. I don't know why that's the case but it seems to be a popular conception.

The other is that they burst-charge more aggressively to take advantage of recovered energy such as while decelerating.

 

This is where the battery registration comes in. It needs to know how much/how quickly it can force energy into the battery so it can operate as effectively as possible in its discharge/charge cycles. If it's trying to fast-charge a battery that can't handle it (including a severely degraded battery that was once registered and functioned properly) it can lead to fire.

 

That's why it's risky to jump start newer BMWs. I'd always heard about it and assumed it was due to incorrectly connecting the jumper cables, but a friend of ours called AAA, they jumped her 5er, and it subsequently burned up a bunch of stuff in the electrical system on the way home. Insurance covered it but it was never right after that and she traded it in.

Edited by Jimmy
I can English reel gud
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t

  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...