Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

38/38 Surprise


Dick R

Recommended Posts

At the risk of being roundly flamed, I’m here to confess my sin.

 

I was considering replacing my 32/36 Weber with a 38/38.  The 32/36 was working fine and I was quite happy with it.  Certainly a big improvement over the single-barrel Solex.  I sought guidance from past FAQ postings but found that there was not much of a consensus on the topic.  Strongly held opinions, both pro and con were what I found.  I wanted to try it on my otherwise stock 71, but I didn’t want to fork over $400+ for an experiment that might only last an hour before concluding that it was not the way to go.  So, I went on Amazon and quickly discovered 38/38 clones made of pure chinesium for a fraction of what a genuine Weber costs.  I bought the cheapest one - which turned out to cost all of $78.   Yup, seventy-eight bucks.  Free delivery in about 12 hours.  This was my kind of experimental investment. 

 

Upon receiving the item, I was immediately impressed.  It was expertly packaged, looked very well made, and included all the hardware needed to work on 2002 or probably other vehicles as well.  I took it out of the box and quickly installed it without any difficulties. Plug and play. I didn’t mess with the jets, but just tried it as received.  The damn thing started right up first kick.  It needed a little mixture and idle adjustment, but that’s all before I hit the road. 

 

The result was shockingly good.  It did everything better than my old genuine Weber.  Started quicker hot or cold, idled smoother, more power, more responsive, revved willingly higher.  The only thing I found needing improvement was a slight hesitation when punched off closed throttle at higher RPM.  I easily remedied that with a couple of bigger Weber idle jets that I had lying around (which fit perfectly).  That eliminated that singular example of hesitation. 

 

So, what’s not to like here for a $78 investment?  No way I’m going back to the 32/36 and no way do I think that a genuine Weber 38/38 would be any better.   

 

One more point – since I only gave this a 50-50 chance of succeeding, I didn’t open up the intake manifold to fit the 38/38 better.  It’s still the same as it always was and runs just fine without any interference with the throttle plate.  I will most likely do that job sometime in the future, but for now I’m having too much fun with my $78 carb. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I for one commend you for trying this experiment! Do you happen to have pics and possibly a link for this magic chinesium 38/38? I have an old 32/36 with the old school coolant choke style system on my completely stock engine and reading your experiment makes me wanna try this on my ride just to see if I can squeeze a tiny bit more power out of my car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with both the Spanish and Chinese Webers or clones is while you'll get some fine carbs there's no guaranty that the next one will work, while I've missed using the Chinese ones I've come across  some Spanish Webers  the seem to have skipped one or two steps in the manufacturing like having passages not drilled or not drilled through and have heard the same for Chinese ones. I'm glad yours worked out.  

  • Like 2

If everybody in the room is thinking the same thing, then someone is not thinking.

 

George S Patton 

Planning the Normandy Break out 1944

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Dick R said:

The result was shockingly good.  It did everything better than my old genuine Weber.  Started quicker hot or cold, idled smoother, more power, more responsive, revved willingly higher. 

 

11 hours ago, Dick R said:

No way I’m going back to the 32/36 and no way do I think that a genuine Weber 38/38 would be any better.   

 

I'm not sure I understand that conclusion; based on what? Reliability? Longevity? (And, comparing an old 32/36 to a new 38/38 is like comparing an old, worn, 12V 1/4" impact wrench to a new 20V 3/8" unit ... not exactly apples-to-apples.)

 

That said, I'm glad you had a good experience -> me, I'm a fan of the 38/38. -KB

 

Image below of knock-off carb - can you spot the manufacturing defect?

 

fail-knock-off-weber-dgv-carb-2.thumb.jpg.05273f54669915d3a6ffcb874e10b21f.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, kbmb02 said:

That said, I'm glad you had a good experience -> me, I'm a fan of the 38/38. -KB

 

Image below of knock-off carb - can you spot the manufacturing defect?

 

fail-knock-off-weber-dgv-carb-2.thumb.jpg.05273f54669915d3a6ffcb874e10b21f.jpg

 

I assume you're referring to the main jet on the "primary side," but the auxiliary venturi on the "secondary side" doesn't look like a good fit either.  Do you call them primary and secondary on a synchronous carb?

 

 

   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple of answers to a couple of questions:

 

1.      Regarding gas mileage - I have no clue.  Never measured it during the 7+ years I’ve had the car and don’t really care about it either.  I usually only drive to local car events with maybe a once-a-year 200-mile round trip to the Woodley Park event near LA.   My opinion is that the MPG has likely degraded for two reasons – two larger synchronized barrels and one more active right foot. 

 

2.     As far as my stated opinion that I didn’t think a genuine Weber would be any better – it was intended to be nothing more than an expression of my opinion.  I value the many opinions expressed on FAQ for all kinds of topics.  Sometimes those opinions are 180 apart.  Even so, I have found them to be extremely helpful.  The knowledge generosity of FAQ participants is unbelievable.  All I was trying to do in this case was to report my experience and my opinions.  Especially because it was a big surprise to me.    

 

I’m happy to answer any questions if I can. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, visionaut said:

there’s two missing brass bits here

 

They don't need those brass bits because that side isn't drilled for the accelerator pump.  It'd be a cool looking carb with pumps on both sides though.  I had a DFEV carb that had the pump on that side and I was tempted to tap the mounting holes and install it on my 32-36, but I sold the carb to a VW guy.  I did warn him about the insufficiently heated intake manifold, but he said his mechanic thought it'd be a good carb.  I didn't argue.

 

EDIT -- the second pump would have been just-for-show, not a working pump.

Edited by '76mintgrün'02
  • Like 1

   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I have to admit to surfing the AllyExpress for all sorts of shiny induction stuffs.

 

I agree with Ken- it's a crapshoot.  Will you get crap?  Only one way to find out!

 

And it sounds like you did just fine.  Don't throw out the 32/36, but have fun with the 38/38!

 

t

 

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, '76mintgrün'02 said:

They don't need those brass bits because that side isn't drilled for the accelerator pump.

In my past life before EFI, the 38/38 that pump squirted into both barrels.  The 32/36 I had didn't.

A radiator shop is a good place to take a leak.

 

I have no idea what I'm doing but I know I'm really good at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t

  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...