Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Sparkplug gap "retread" (not carpet related)


Guest Anonymous

Recommended Posts

Guest Anonymous

Per the archives, this subject has been lightly covered. At the risk of repetition, what is the largest "workable gap" you people run and on what type of sparkplugs and ignition system?

My limited research suggests that most manufacturers have increased the spark plug gaps over the years to maximize efficiency, so that the fuel mixture

burns more completely thus allowing better fuel economy lower emissions and maybe more power. Larger gaps appear have become vogue as the car makers said goodby to MR. Kettering's points system and hello to transistorized "electronic" ignition. It seems that BMW was one of the few makers that did not up their gaps significantly. (My 318 had a recommended gap of .036).

Was it because of clearance issues? Fear of overstressing the secondary system?

I have noticed much smoother running and increased throttle response when I have increased the gaps in my 02. I am not advocating that anyone follow my lead. But I wonder, with all of the wealth of experience out there, have you ever noticed any serious "decrease" in performance by running larger gaps?

Anyone? JohnA? PaulW? PatA? Zen?

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am running an Electromotive DIS with a .045" gap. That is coupled with 318EFI system. It works great and I have never fouled a plug!

Prior to that, with the stock ignition, I could gap to .030 without any issues.

Good Luck,

Mike (#87)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

Thank you Bob for your response. Same goes to other responders!

At the risk of beating a dead horse, allow me to ask a followup or two.

You say your car runs great running the stock gap .024. Have you ever tried running larger gaps? Is this just a case of aint broke no need to fix. Again, I am NOT advocating that you increase your gaps.

A little background. Years and years ago I had a bone stock low mile 02 with a Solex 2bbl. that would not pass smog. Blamed the problem on Solex when friends at local dealership said the Solex was prone to internal warping making it virtually untunable. (Knowing what I know now, I rather doubt it.) In any event, I swapped solexes from an Audi/VW (had same jetting) and still couldnt pass smog. Tired fiddling with ignition timing - still no better. Tried Weber 32/36. After serious jet swapping, car would now idle and pass smog but would misfire with serious progression problems.

Having passed Smog, I attempted to make the car more drivable. Out of sheer boredom and because I fiddle from time to time with other cars and boats, I tried increasing the plug gaps. Engine ran remarkably smoother. progression problems either disappeared or were masked so I could not notice them.

For grins I even tried running one of the Solexes again. Good grief, car seemed to better too. Although, it leaned out considerably and missed at top end 5000 +.

As you might imagine, I have manipulated advance curves including initial and total advance and am no stranger to trying new miracle products and ideas and debunking old wives' tales. I've fallen prey to my fair share too! But over the years, the gap thing has always been one of the easiest and least drastic modifications, I've wondered if I have been missing something.

Go ahead, tell me what I'm missing! (other than new carpeting) Incidentally, since you live in the land of perpetual heat, do you take any additional steps to avoid vapor lock or other heat-related problems??

Thanks for you indulgence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With an MSD6al and a Crane coil,

I run .045 without problems.

But it really doesn't make too much difference.

Plugs last longer, but when they erode, performance

falls off much faster.

t

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Pertronix and use Bosch W8DC plugs, the come in a pack of 4 pre-gapped to .8mm (.031"). No need to regap, and they run great, and very little burnt oil fouling (old valve seals) compared to pre Pertronix days. I have not tried a wider gap for comparison. Beaner7102

1971 - 2002 RHD VIN 1653940. Agave (stock with Pertronix & 32/36 Weber) - "Cactus"

1972 - 1602 RHD VIN 1554408. Fjord (with 2L motor, 5spd & LSD - Weber 40/40 to come) - "Bluey"

1984 - E30 318i VIN WBAAK320208722176 - stock daily driver

Link to comment
Share on other sites

on both my stock, tired 69 engine, and my newly rebuilt '73 with 9.5 pistons...that gap works equally well.

mike

'69 Nevada sunroof-Wolfgang-bought new
'73 Sahara sunroof-Ludwig-since '78
'91 Brillantrot 318is sunroof-Georg Friederich 
Fiat Topolini (Benito & Luigi), Renault 4CVs (Anatole, Lucky Pierre, Brigette) & Kermit, the Bugeye Sprite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 years later...

Years ago we were doing some dyno work and tried various plugs and plug gaps.  The car had a MSD 6A ign. box.  Various plugs made no significant difference but we settled on NGK non-resistor plugs.  For street motors -NGK BP6ES.  On the race cars we use BP8ES.   We found gaps from .032" to .040" gave about the same results.  Larger than .040" did not produce more power although CD ignitions will fire the plugs at much larger gaps.  Gaps below .030" produced less power.  At .028" gap we had lost nearly 10%.   With a stock ign. or a pertronix type ignitor which is just a magnetic switch I'd suggest .032" to .035" gap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, jireland2002 said:

Years ago we were doing some dyno work and tried various plugs and plug gaps.  The car had a MSD 6A ign. box.  Various plugs made no significant difference but we settled on NGK non-resistor plugs.  For street motors -NGK BP6ES.  On the race cars we use BP8ES.   We found gaps from .032" to .040" gave about the same results.  Larger than .040" did not produce more power although CD ignitions will fire the plugs at much larger gaps.  Gaps below .030" produced less power.  At .028" gap we had lost nearly 10%.   With a stock ign. or a pertronix type ignitor which is just a magnetic switch I'd suggest .032" to .035" gap.

 

I run NGKBP6ES in my car (stock motor with IE dizzy). Next time I change my plugs I'll try the .032 gap. I'm running a tighter gap now. I'd like to see if the power increases.

mike tunney

Link to comment
Share on other sites

123Ignition electronic dizzy, red coil, NGK BP6ES gapped .034

 

Previously, I've run various dizzies with different types of electronic ignitors and gapped plugs at .034, as well.  Never an issue. 

 

Ed

'69 Granada... long, long ago  

'71 Manila..such a great car

'67 Granada 2000CS...way cool

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...