Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

There is no such thing as a 2 1/2 mph (front) bumper


Recommended Posts

For years, I've referred to the chrome bumpers that stand out slightly from the body on the mid-'72 through '73 cars as "2 1/2 mph bumpers." Other folks here on the FAQ refer to them this way as well. And we all refer to the big-ass bumpers that started in '74 as "5 mph bumpers."

As part of the proofreading process for my book, Bentley gently challenged me on it, saying that the DOT regulations say that 5 mph front and 2 1/2 rear bumper regulations came in on September 1st and were generally adopted for the 1973 model year.

They're right. Wikipedia has a good summary here.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bumper_(automobile)

Scroll down to "First Standards."

Regarding the confusion over why the DOT rules for the 1973 model year seemed to mandate 5 mph bumpers, whereas we know that on our beloved cars there was only a subtle change in '73 (the chrome bumpers being slightly pushed away from the body), whereas the bridge abutments that we all call "5 mph bumpers" started in '74, the salient sentence is here:

"The 1973 model year passenger cars sold in the U.S. used a variety designs. They ranged from non-dynamic versions with solid rubber guards, to "recoverable" designs with oil and nitrogen filled telescoping shock-absorbers. The standards were further beefed up for the 1974 model year passenger cars with standardized height front and rear bumpers that could take angle impacts at 5-mile-per-hour (8 km/h) with no damage to the car's lights, safety equipment, and engine. "

So, that's it. The slightly-pushed-out chrome front bumpers mid-72 through 73 are technically 5 mph bumpers, but not designed for impact from any angle.

You learn something new every day.

The new book The Best Of The Hack Mechanic available at https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0998950742, inscribed copies of all books available at www.robsiegel.com

1972 tii (Louie), 1973 2002 (Hampton), 1975 ti tribute (Bertha), 1972 Bavaria, 1973 3.0CSi, 1979 Euro 635CSi, 1999 Z3, 1999 M Coupe, 2003 530i sport, 1974 Lotus Europa Twin Cam Special (I know, I know...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh god that picture... But yeah early and euro bumpers are purely cosmetic specially before they had the rubber strips.

I'm no longer affiliated with Maximillian Importing Company in any way, please address any questions directly to them.  -Thanks.

2002 "tii" coupe 1970
E21 320/6 2.7 Stroker 1981
E23 730 1978

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A number of years ago, while stopped at a red light, I had an 18-wheeler tractor from Mexico (thank God he didn't have his trailer behind him at the time) hit the back of my '75. Pushed the shocks in somewhat - and that was all. Didn't even mar the rubber profile. Replaced the shocks with some used ones from someone on the board here and all was well.

The jewelry-bumper boys can bad mouth the big bumpers all they want but I've been saved damage a couple of times by having them.

Bob Napier

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A number of years ago, while stopped at a red light, I had an 18-wheeler tractor from Mexico (thank God he didn't have his trailer behind him at the time) hit the back of my '75. Pushed the shocks in somewhat - and that was all. Didn't even mar the rubber profile. Replaced the shocks with some used ones from someone on the board here and all was well.

The jewelry-bumper boys can bad mouth the big bumpers all they want but I've been saved damage a couple of times by having them.

Bob Napier

i feel like such a traitor to the big bumper crowd Bob. i put jewelry bumpers on my 75....not for looks though! just for lightness. it is an odd feeling driving on the street knowing there just aint nothin' there....

2xM3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On my former 74 2002, I had a stock Chevy S10 crash into my back end when freeway traffic in the LA area came to a stop. The damage was similar to the pic that Eastbimmer posted above. The S10 cleared my diving board bumpers and did that type of damage to my rear panel. In this period of large pickups and SUV's, diving board bumpers will not help much if you are rear ended. AMHIK!

G-Man

74 tii (many mods)
91 318i M42

07 4Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On my former 74 2002, I had a stock Chevy S10 crash into my back end when freeway traffic in the LA area came to a stop. The damage was similar to the pic that Eastbimmer posted above. The S10 cleared my diving board bumpers and did that type of damage to my rear panel. In this period of large pickups and SUV's, diving board bumpers will not help much if you are rear ended. AMHIK!

G-Man

And with that I guess you have to consider where you live and the average type vehicles around you. I'm in the stix and 90% of the vehicles are SUV's or pickum-up trucks. So I figured I'm done regardless. so lighter bumpers going on.....

IMG_6653.jpg

1976 2002 Custom Dk Blue w/ Pearl

1975 2002A Sahara (sold Feb 2008)

SiteNamecopy.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...