Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Negative camber correction


MarcD

Recommended Posts

Ran into a weird issue trying to squeeze my 205/50's onto my mostly stock suspension. Everything fit great except for the passenger side where I can't clear the strut tube. It's almost as if the strut tube has been bent but the distance from the mounting surface to the knuckle is the same left to right as well as the distance from strut tube to the mounting surface. Lower control arms look good. Upper bearing plates don't seem worn. No obvious signs of wear on either front tire. Alignment is not great but I don't see an alignment correcting any negative camber. 

 

The passenger side has a slight negative camber with no obvious signs of damage. Can worn bushings cause this? I went ahead and ordered a set of urethanes from IE thinking it will at least eliminate some of the variables. Honestly the car probably needs a complete pivot point refresh anyway even though everything feels nice and tight when it's up on the rack. I' guessing I should go ahead and replace the strut bearings while I'm in there even if mine still feel tight. I'd rather not go with adjustable plates. If something can be adjusted you bet your ass I will adjust it wrong. 

 

I noticed a thread in my search where someone had a similar issue and the two bushings on the front of their subframe ( radius rod?) installed backwards. There was mention of this possibly causing asymmetric camber issues.  Mine are facing the correct direction but seem worn although feel tight. This is the thread

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Presume you've checked the wheels to make sure they aren't bent...didja try swapping wheels side to side?

 

mike

  • Like 4

'69 Nevada sunroof-Wolfgang-bought new
'73 Sahara sunroof-Ludwig-since '78
'91 Brillantrot 318is sunroof-Georg Friederich 
Fiat Topolini (Benito & Luigi), Renault 4CVs (Anatole, Lucky Pierre, Brigette) & Kermit, the Bugeye Sprite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only things related to the contact between tire and strut tube would be the stuff between them. That is tire width, wheel width, wheel ET, hub, brake disc and possible spacers, wheel bearings and the strut tube itself. So, the side to side difference should be found from those components. These can be examined on table, as well as whole assembly. Alignment, ball joints and bushings are all, while otherwise important, irrelevant to this matter.

Racing is Life - everything before and after is just waiting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mike Self said:

Presume you've checked the wheels to make sure they aren't bent...didja try swapping wheels side to side?

 

mike

Swapped the wheels around. Every wheel rubs on the same spot on the front passenger side. Very weird. 

 

7 hours ago, Tommy said:

Only things related to the contact between tire and strut tube would be the stuff between them. That is tire width, wheel width, wheel ET, hub, brake disc and possible spacers, wheel bearings and the strut tube itself. So, the side to side difference should be found from those components. These can be examined on table, as well as whole assembly. Alignment, ball joints and bushings are all, while otherwise important, irrelevant to this matter.

 

That's what I figured. Just seems odd that mounting surface measurements are the same left to right yet I'm contacting the strut tube with the tire so much so I can't even mount the wheel properly. At first I thought it might be worn upper strut mount.

 

The only thing I did not check was strut tube diameter but It's hard to imagine that being the issue. 

 

The only explanation is a bent strut tube. I'll have to put the 195's back on until I take them off to verify and source a replacement strut. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MarcD said:

The only explanation is a bent strut tube. I'll have to put the 195's back on until I take them off to verify and source a replacement strut. 

That's probably it. By cleaning it well you could see deformation somewhere on the tube. Perhaps also the shaft could be bent?

  • Like 1

Racing is Life - everything before and after is just waiting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Data point:

 

I’ve done some investigation of this lately (with 2 race cars with very bent struts after contact incidents).

 

With a digital angle finder/level, I measure a 9 degree angle (+/-)* between the tube and the caliper flange/mounting surface on stock, *50 year old struts.

 

YRMV. -KB

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MarcD said:

Ah but is the driver side bent out or is the passenger side bent inwards?

Which width and ET wheel you're fitting? We could make a guess...

Racing is Life - everything before and after is just waiting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Hans said:

That won't explain why only one side rubs. 

No, no, but knowing that we could try guess which side is bent.

 

If I make assumption that the wheels are 7" wide I can say if the ET is 26 or less the side not fitting is bent. If ET is 28 or more the one that fits is bent.

Edited by Tommy
  • Like 1

Racing is Life - everything before and after is just waiting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tommy said:

No, no, but knowing that we could try guess which side is bent.

 

If I make assumption that the wheels are 7" wide I can say if the ET is 26 or less the side not fitting is bent. If ET is 28 or more the one that fits is bent.

Pretty sure he ruled that out by switching wheels around.

 

Most likely passenger side strut tube is bent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tommy said:

I must be choosing wrong words since neither of you got what I meant.


I understand, Tommy. Your method is not conclusive, but may possibly point to the culprit. Without knowing the rim width and ET, however, we can’t move forward with this path of investigation!

 

In an earlier thread, @MarcD made a passing reference to 15 x 7, ET25, but it’s not clear he’s using those rims here.

 

Best regards,

 

Steve

 

1976 2002 Polaris, 2742541 (original owner)

1973 2002tii Inka, 2762757 (not-the-original owner)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...