Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

What's the diff in shim thickness?


Recommended Posts

I've got a leaking differential in my '73. Again. :(  I removed it 2 years ago and re-sealed both axles as well as bearing, re-sealed the rear. Alas, the driver side is still leaking and appears to be both the output bearing housing and the axle shaft seal. 

 

I am fairly certain the diff is a replacement from a '76 e21 -- a few pix posted and would appreciate confirmation of this.

 

In looking up replacement parts, I see at least five different thickness shims listed in realoem. Any advice on how to decide which thickness to purchase?

 

Screen Shot 2021-03-02 at 8.49.52 AM.png

IMG_3469.jpeg

IMG_3470.jpeg

IMG_3472.jpeg

--

'73 Sahara numbers matching 

'74 Mintgrun sunroof car w/ oem Golde deflector, euro bumpers, 5spd, owned since 2002

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can’t help you solve your shim thickness issue. But I can confirm (or deny) your general conclusion about the differential’s origins!

 

The housing was cast December 1, 1976 (“01M76” cast into the top rear of the housing), the differential was assembled January 1977 (“1” over “7”, stamped into the left front flank of the housing), and the rear cover was cast September 1976 (9? nubs surrounding “76”). The original ratio was 3.64 (“40” / “11”, stamped into the left front flank of the housing).

 

But that looks like an ‘02 rear cover, not an e21 cover. And it post-dates the end of 2002 production in July 1976. So it appears to be a replacement part. Yes, of course, the rear cover may well have been transferred from an ‘02 to an e21 differential. But when all the dates are relatively close — September 1976 through January 1977 — my first guess is that this is a replacement differential for an ‘02. Notice also how the stub-axle flanges stand away from the four-bolt side covers. Below is a 1978 differential, from an e21, with the same four-bolt side covers: but note how close the flanges sit to the side covers. The differential could have also started life in a 1977 e21 (produced August 1976 through August 1977), but then you must explain why it happens to have an ‘02 replacement rear cover, a relatively rare item. And there must have been some modifications to move those flanges outward.

 

Sorry to distract from your real needs, but I love a well-dated piece of machinery! ?

 

Regards,

 

Steve

 

ACB29BE1-7871-4D11-8537-3D773B2E567E.jpeg

  • Like 1

1976 2002 Polaris, 2742541 (original owner)

1973 2002tii Inka, 2762757 (not-the-original owner)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have any grooves or galling on the output shaft where the seal rides, that could be the issue.  Also the shims go first against the bearing housing then the o-ring seal.  The shims support the bearing and backlash clearance, as long as all four bolts (each side) are at the same torque spec.  

FWIW

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ooooo, good deets! Thanks. 

 

When I did the rebuild two years ago I accidentally put a slight bend in the shim. I figured it would press out just fine, but am slightly suspicious of this and figured it'd be a cheap part while I have it out and open again. Just not sure on appropriate thickness..

--

'73 Sahara numbers matching 

'74 Mintgrun sunroof car w/ oem Golde deflector, euro bumpers, 5spd, owned since 2002

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off shims have nothing to do with sealing. They are used to align the ring gear with the pinion gear. If not done properly the diff will usually make noise and wear prematurely.

 

If you want to replace the bent shim you need to measure its thickness to determine which one you need to buy.

 

Like @Schnellvintagesaid you should check the sealing surfaces 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Answer to post title- thikness.

 

Did you replace the o- rings in the inset groove inside the side covers?

 

They seal the shims so oil can't get out that way.

 

If you didn't have any o- rings and can't find any,

 

o- ring- in- a- tube will work, but in this instance you 

have to be really careful to only use the barest minimum the 

groove will take.  Too much will squooge in between the shims,

and then you'll have... well, eventually, other problems.

 

t

do nawt seek to replace the shims.

ullltra blaaaak.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, I did replace the o-rings. my refresh two years ago included:

  • rubber o-rings (shows as #10)
  • roller bearings (#8)
  • shaft seal (#4)
  • rear cover gasket

I was def disappointed that it still leaked. Scratching my head a bit for sure, as I thought I did everything by the book correctly. Oh well, as soon as the spring melt water dries out a bit I'll be taking the diff out again and concentrating on the driver side!

 

Thanks for all the tips.

Screen Shot 2021-03-04 at 5.18.23 PM.png

--

'73 Sahara numbers matching 

'74 Mintgrun sunroof car w/ oem Golde deflector, euro bumpers, 5spd, owned since 2002

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Schnellvintage said:

Do you have a Long Neck Diff??  Those have the aluminum sides.  They can also leak around the bolts in the side cover.  I use a little Dirko (or other sealant) on the threads when installing.  

 

 

 

 

Oh, nope! It's a shortneck (not as pictured from realoem diagram)

  • Haha 1

--

'73 Sahara numbers matching 

'74 Mintgrun sunroof car w/ oem Golde deflector, euro bumpers, 5spd, owned since 2002

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...