Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

M10 + E12 Carnage & Rebuild


ajordan282
Go to solution Solved by Son of Marty,

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Aaron R said:

This is rad. I am down the valley from you in Staunton and remember when that car sold. Mine is a Malaga-ish '74 tii. I very, very nearly did a full rebuild last summer but decided to slam it back together and run it for now. Got a set of injectors from Marty, as well as gaskets and borrowed some tools. Left the pump alone once I freed it up. Marty rules.

 

Excited to see how the rest of the build goes.

 

Might have to pick your brain about the machinist when the time comes ...


Very cool that you recognize the car!

 

A lot of good machinists down your way! When I was in school in Charlottesville there were several around. And after school I ran a CNC business and we outsourced some work to guys in Staunton and Lynchburg. Up here in northern Virginia there aren’t many engine machining options but the guy I ended up using is awesome. Super particular and very willing to share knowledge. Just what I need lol. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the camshaft locating pin. I don't think it's used with any style of oil pump gears so it is a bit weird that it's delivered with oil pump chain.

  • Thanks 1

Racing is Life - everything before and after is just waiting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Tommy said:

That's the camshaft locating pin. I don't think it's used with any style of oil pump gears so it is a bit weird that it's delivered with oil pump chain.


sweet. I had sort of come to the conclusion that it was added to the bag by mistake or as a courtesy for something they thought I might need. Given that the order included all the motor chains and sprockets including an adjustable cam gear, a cam locating pin would make sense!! 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Head is torqued!

 

timing chain feels pretty tight. Not sure what’s up with that. The tensioning rail is all the way bottomed out on the inside of the timing cover. It is a new chain, new guide and tensioner, new crank sprocket, and new IE cam sprocket….so maybe that’s why? read on here of another case or two that are similar in terms of seeming too tight. Open to criticisms.  
 

speaking of criticisms, it seems like my $166 dollar bolt kit doesn’t include upper timing cover bolts....it’s not like they’re 6 of the most visible or anything….McMaster Carr to the rescue. 
 

 

 

IMG_8135.jpeg

IMG_8136.jpeg

Edited by ajordan282
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Would anyone recommend I check Piston to Valve Clearance?  If so can I do it with solder wire like checking squish on a dirtbike?  Maybe I'm asking a bit late since the head is torqued....from reading I think I am probably ok though.  Just looking for a sanity check on this and my taught timing chain mentioned above.  Specs:

 

-Block has not been decked

-Pistons are Euro Tii Piano Tops

-Head is decked .012"

-Head Gasket is 0.3mm thicker  (.011")

-Cam is stock

 

And another question - I don't need to do any fanciness with the cam sprocket timing do I?  I do have the adjustable IE unit.  Since I'm basically at stock crank to cam height I assume there's no magic to be performed.

 

I think I am in the unsweet spot of reading to much to be blissfully ignorant, but not enough to understand all of the technical engine mumbojumbo. 

Edited by ajordan282
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My cam chain was pretty tight once the tensioner was in, as I recall. I had the head decked I-forget-how-much (20 thou I think but don’t hold me to it), chucked a stock head gasket in it, never checked anything, and sent it. Runs like a top. 
 

Of course, ymmv and I am an idiot, so. Grain of salt and shit. 

Edited by Aaron R
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve convinced myself to move on for a handful of reasons, not just that I don’t want to pull the head and clay it lol. I’ll definitely survive, hopefully it’ll survive. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Had a bit of a discussion with my machinist about facing the used 228mm flywheel I just picked up from @Squid's 02 (who by the way was a great seller to deal with, thanks again!)

 

Overall thickness at the friction surface is .560" and manual states no less than .532" so we are good there I believe.

 

However, we are discussing the "step" or "lip" between the friction surface and the surface the flex plate bolts to.  The current step on the used flywheel is .011".  Larry's bible, The Engine Rebuilder's Association handbooks, state the step should be .011".  Reading on here, I have found that the 2002masters state .3mm-.55mm (.012-.022").

 

The flywheel that came out of the car which is for some reason potato chipped and destined for the scrap pile measured total thickness of .565" and had NO step which is also "wrong" as far as I can tell, but somehow seemed to work fine on the short drive I took in the car.

 

Do I accept Larry's .011" step, or fight for more? Why??  

Edited by ajordan282
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

throwing parts on until it runs. taking me forever because I keep standing back and just staring at it like a caveman. shiny metal good. me like. hope it run and no boom. 
 

btw machinist put a .011 step on the flywheel, showed me in his fancy book where it called for that. I wanted 12-20 thou based on research here but oh well. Should be fine considering the original flywheel had no step and the action/engagement felt fine. 
 

 

IMG_8377.jpeg

IMG_8378.jpeg

IMG_8379.jpeg

IMG_8380.jpeg

Edited by ajordan282
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t

  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...