Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

More Power For My Rally Car...


Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I use my 2002 as a club rally /hillclimb car.  When I built the engine I was aiming for a 150 Hp but the dyno suggests that I missed by about 20-30 Hp. I'm now on a search for my missing ponies, don't get me wrong it runs really well and was professionally tuned by a well regarded local motorsport tuner so there's nothing actually broken.

 

The engine is 10:1 compression ratio with JE pistons  +1mm oversized valves and a 304° cam.

 

I run a E30 318 inlet manifold with a E30 325 throttle body, and an LInk ECU.  The exhaust manifold is off a 520 which looks to be the same as a Tii one.  I'm restricted on what I can do with the exhaust as I'm RHD.

 

I suspect the issue is the 318 manifold is just not flowing well enough to suit the cam,  does anyone have experience that would confirm that suspicion ?.

 

I'd appreciate comments on my options which seem to be,

 

Change to a twin DCOE 45 setup.  Pros: kits are not that expensive (about $1500), it will but me back into the historic class for some events.  Cons: I like that I can reach in through the window, turn the key and it will start, I may lose some low range driveabilty.

 

Change to DCOE type fuel injection throttle bodies, Pros: should make good power, Cons:  kind of expensive.

 

Change to a Tii inlet manifold, I believe they flow better than the 318, modifying it to take EFI injectors should be within my skill set.  Pros: probably the cheapest option, Cons: Will it make a significant difference?.

 

Build my own inlet system based on motorcycle throttle bodies, it's probably right on the edge of my skill set, the learning curve could be quite expensive.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would go to work with the ECU tuning on a dyno...  spark advance and mixture have a lot of power 

hidden in them on this engine.

 

Similar engine, tuned carefully on a dyno with 40mm DCOEs did 140.  With headers, and 32mm chokes.

 

I do think the headers would help hp, but possibly at the expense of torque.

 

How big are your collector and final exhaust pipes?

 

Also, what are you using for an air filter.

 

 

hth

 

t

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the car was tuned it was on a Dynapack dyno (hub dyno), the operator is very well respected in local motorsport circles so I don't believe there's huge gains to be made there.

 

I'm using a fairly large K & N filter, K & N suggest it's Ok for 3.0 litres.  Exhaust is 2" with a fairly free flow muffler. (The car's quite loud).

 

The 2" section starts from where the two down pipes join.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try a 2 1/2" tailpipe.

 

Or measure your backpressure and see if it's high (and no, I'm not sure what 'high' is!)

 

And try larger primary pipes from the manifold- stock on a 2002 is pretty small.

If you could pack a header of reasonable design in there, it would help- but a bad

one would be worse...

 

The 318 manifold's not fantastic- but its not bad.  Especially for mid- range torque, just like your exhaust...

 

Have you checked the ECU mapping and behavior, as in, your fuel injectors aren't at saturation, etc?

Also, check your o2 readings and timing map- you can run these engines in the high 12:1's with 36- 38 degrees 

of total advance and get real power from that.

I have so much faith in 'reputable tuning shops' that I check their work to see their genius in action!

(as in, hire someone good and then convince yourself that they've done good work)

 

What did you get for a torque curve?  You might be making grunt instead of spinning too the moon- and torque wins races...

 

t

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possible tuning issues aside, I think changing to a Tii-style manifold from a 320i with a 58 to 60 mm throttle body would flow better.  I read somewhere on this forum that there are some suitable injectors that fit without machining the manifold. 

Edited by allbim

No amount of skill or education will ever replace dumb luck
1971 2002 (much modified rocket),  1987 635CSI (beauty),  

2000 323i,  1996 Silverado Pickup (very useful)

Too many cars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did it make peak power? Is it in the range you would expect for the cam or earlier? If earlier, it is probably airflow. Was vacuum zero at WOT? What was timing at WOT/peak power? Short timing can hurt across the board. Older design, less efficient combustion chambers usually require more timing to make power.

 

If you can, post the dyno sheet.

 

Rob


Where did it make peak power? Is it in the range you would expect for the cam or earlier? If earlier, it is probably airflow. Was vacuum zero at WOT? What was timing at WOT/peak power? Short timing can hurt across the board. Older design, less efficient combustion chambers usually require more timing to make power.

 

If you can, post the dyno sheet.

 

Rob

1971 Corvette, BBC to LS1 swap under way
1991 Camaro, ProCharged 355
1969 Corvette Greenwood/IMSA project
1974 BMW 2002, barn find, M42 on a stand, turbo header in a box

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am going through this right now and it has become pretty clear to me that the restriction is intake manifold.  I have the same setup and there is no doubt that it restricts top end.

Maybe, maybe not.  It's the valves.

post-9282-0-30222500-1382566965_thumb.jp

A radiator shop is a good place to take a leak.

 

I have no idea what I'm doing but I know I'm really good at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2nd TobyB. Make sure your spark and fuel are correct before you start changing out the parts. Otherwise you just end up comparing unoptimized setup a vs unoptimized setup carrot. As MRForce stated at WOT expecilly at high RPMs you the intake manifold gauge pressure should be close to 0. That would be an easy check to see if there is a problem on the intake side before you head into a tune.

76 '02 owned 20 years.....project for the last 13. I should probably be faster than the rust I'm chasing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what happens over 5800rpm?  a 304cam should be good for well over that i would think with proper valve springs and pistons. looks like hp curve was still rising.

 

agree with toby on the exhaust.  2in is too small.  2002 turbo stock exhaust is 2 1/8in.  should go to 2.5in.

2xM3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anything other than the air induction system or in the tune file (afr, spark or fuel settings) any later data is invalid and can't be compared to the above dyno rusults as far as chest thumping for which manifold is better.

Edited by jimk

A radiator shop is a good place to take a leak.

 

I have no idea what I'm doing but I know I'm really good at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just a note that dynopacks read quite a bit lower than dynojets. Maybe you should redyno on a dynojet.

Using a dyno that reports greater results depends on whether he wants a real power increase or more bragging rights.

A radiator shop is a good place to take a leak.

 

I have no idea what I'm doing but I know I'm really good at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Using a dyno that reports greater results depends on whether he wants a real power increase or more bragging rights.

Jim, you have some valid points but is the condescension really necessary?  We're all on the same team here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t

  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...