Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Speedometer ratio question


Recommended Posts

I have a couple different speedometers, one is 1.297w and one is 1.393w.  I will have a 3.91 diff when I'm done, so I want the 1.393 Speedo. I don't know the condition of the speedos, and to be honest, if the rear plate of these speedometers was ever replaced then who knows what ratio they really are.

 

So, I have a Speedo cable hooked up to a drill. The 1.393 Speedo reads 75 at max speed and the 1.297 reads 70.  I'm trying to find out if that seems to be a reasonable difference between the two different speedo ratios, thereby confirming one is a 1.297 and the other is the 1.393?

 

I know there was a speedo face overlay replacement that BMW did with the 76's. Was it some or all of them? Both of my speedos have the same face, so not sure if that plays into it at all. 

Karl B.

1974 2002tii Malaga ("Conrad") -->> Conrad's Restoration Blog

2003 330i ZHP 6-spd

2011 328i xDrive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bergie33 said:

So, I have a Speedo cable hooked up to a drill. The 1.393 Speedo reads 75 at max speed and the 1.297 reads 70.  I'm trying to find out if that seems to be a reasonable difference between the two different speedo ratios, thereby confirming one is a 1.297 and the other is the 1.393?

The numbers represent the number of driveshaft turns per mile.  If you calculate the wheel turns per mile, then it will tell the differential ratio that each was intended for use with.

 

Keep in mind, what you perceive as a decimal point is a comma in Europe.

Edited by jimk
  • Like 1

A radiator shop is a good place to take a leak.

 

I have no idea what I'm doing but I know I'm really good at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a whole lot of 76 speedo's got the overlay before BMW made the switch to the 1.39 ratio to match the 3.90 rear end. The 1.39 speedo with the 3.91  rear end will fall well with in the error of the system. The chart was ripped off from a old post by Les.

List (below) taken from a post earlier this year.

3.45:1 diff -- W=1.24 speedo

3.64:1 diff -- W=1.297 speedo (W=1.30 is close enough)

3.90:1 diff -- W=1.39 speedo ('76 49-State 2002)

3.91:1 diff -- W=1.393 speedo (E21 320is LSD)

4.10:1 diff -- W=1.4 speedo (1.461 calculated)

4.11:1 diff -- W=1.4 speedo (1.465 calculated)

4.38:1 diff -- W=1.559 speedo (calculated)

  • Like 2

If everybody in the room is thinking the same thing, then someone is not thinking.

 

George S Patton 

Planning the Normandy Break out 1944

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jimk said:

The numbers represent the number of driveshaft turns per mile.  If you calculate the wheel turns per mile, then it will tell the differential ratio that each was intended for use with.

 

Keep in mind, what you perceive as a decimal point is a comma in Europe.

 

Ok, gotcha.  I never knew exactly what the 1,393 and 1,297 referred to. Thanks. And by driveshaft, I assume you mean the Speedo driveshaft and not the transmission driveshaft, correct? 

Karl B.

1974 2002tii Malaga ("Conrad") -->> Conrad's Restoration Blog

2003 330i ZHP 6-spd

2011 328i xDrive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, bergie33 said:

And by driveshaft, I assume you mean the Speedo driveshaft and not the transmission driveshaft, correct? 

You are correct.  The speedo drive gear has a ratio of 2.5 main driveshaft turns to one speedo cable turn (2.5 :1).

 

The stamped numbers are used to calibrate the speedo at 60 mph if the spindle is turned at that rpm.

 

The stamped number x 2.5 also represents the engine rpm at 60 mph in 4th gear with oe tire rolling diameter. 

 

  • Like 3

A radiator shop is a good place to take a leak.

 

I have no idea what I'm doing but I know I'm really good at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/24/2024 at 9:54 PM, Son of Marty said:

Not a whole lot of 76 speedo's got the overlay before BMW made the switch to the 1.39 ratio to match the 3.90 rear end. The 1.39 speedo with the 3.91  rear end will fall well with in the error of the system. The chart was ripped off from a old post by Les.

List (below) taken from a post earlier this year.

3.45:1 diff -- W=1.24 speedo

3.64:1 diff -- W=1.297 speedo (W=1.30 is close enough)

3.90:1 diff -- W=1.39 speedo ('76 49-State 2002)

3.91:1 diff -- W=1.393 speedo (E21 320is LSD)

4.10:1 diff -- W=1.4 speedo (1.461 calculated)

4.11:1 diff -- W=1.4 speedo (1.465 calculated)

4.38:1 diff -- W=1.559 speedo (calculated)


As @Son of Marty says, very few ‘76 models ever received the speedometer overlay. It was a dealer installed “fix” for speedometers that were marked 1.39 by the factory but actually contained 1.297 gears. My ‘76 (VIN 2742541, April 19, 1976) has a speedometer marked 1.39, but with 1.297 gears. After reading about the problem in two consecutive issues of the Roundel, I asked my dealer if the problem might apply to my car. They replied, “Of course not, that problem was fixed long before your car was built!” 🙄

 

The truth was that no one knew how many mis-marked speedometers were produced. And, before GPS, there was no easy way to verify your speedometer’s accuracy short of getting a ticket. After GPS, I discovered my speedometer was off by nearly 10%, crushing my belief that my bone-stock ‘02 had cruised between 116 and 120 mph on the New York Thruway from Rochester to Syracuse… 😟

 

Regards,

 

Steve

 

IMG_3493.jpeg

IMG_3494.jpeg

1976 2002 Polaris, 2742541 (original owner)

1973 2002tii Inka, 2762757 (not-the-original owner)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...