Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Engine build for 5,000' of elevation?


irdave

Recommended Posts

Hello.  I'm Dave.  Pretty new here.  I've secured a hand-shake deal on a '72 tii, with a reported 240,000 miles and which has been sitting, outside, for about 15 years...  So the whole thing is a bit rough.

 

It's coming with an extra tii engine that's already in pieces but only had 40k miles on it when it came apart.

 

This is going to be a completely fun car- it won't have to pass the wife test.  So until we get all the lost paperwork found, I'm stuck with mental masturbation...  Maybe you guys can help. :)

 

Anyone care to share any ideas on how much compression I can run if the car never goes below 5,000 ft?  I run non-ethanol premium in everything right now- it's available at a pump in town.  If I squeeze it a bit can I / should I use the stock fuel injection or switch to carbs?  I've got a line on 4 FCR Keihin carbs (best 4 stroke moto carb ever made), which I'm very familiar with tuning...  (If 2 is better than 1, then 4 is better than 2?)  I'd like to be able to roll up to about 7k rpm on a moderately regular basis...  It already has some Motorola electronic ignition...  Plastic intake, with one of them taped up- apparently it's cracked...

 

Anyways, any thoughts on the matter would be greatly appreciated.

tii.jpg

Edited by irdave

Dave.

'76, totally stock. Completely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stock injection is going to give you seamless, smooth, effortless, no-drama performance equal to - or better than most multiple carb set-ups, unless you go silly with hurling cash at it.... the last 10 horsepower will be the most expensive. It always is. While I applaud your idea about using 4 carbs - creativity is great - I think you'll be disappointed, unless you toss a $400 cam, $900 pistons, $500 flywheel, and other bits in to it. Even then - you'll have a $8000 engine making only 30% more horsepower that commands constant fiddling. 

 

US compression (9.0-9.5-ish) should be good for 91-93 east coast pump gas. I believe Euro compression on the early motors was 10:1, and that's what I run... but out west, I discovered ALL the fuel flat out sucks. Definitely watched my Ps and Qs with ignition timing the entire time I was out there.

 

Also - and just to throw this out there: a tii with it's original and complete, functioning engine is worth about 30% or more, when re-sale time comes. 

 

I've had silly, 180hp 2002s with all the expensive go-faster parts in it.....and yet a bone stock, but properly tuned tii is still my preferred mode of hauling holy ass. 

 

Embrace the original injection. Learn it. It's easy, but takes patience. Once it's set up - it can be absolutely goddamned bulletproof. If you want to tinker with multiple carbs (and hell yeah, they're fun and cool and make all the right noises.... I get it!) Find a non tii and sell this one to fund the hotrodding. :) Early plastic-runner tiis are special cars. There's a visceral driving difference to them, even when compared to late 72 metal runner cars. Trashing the injection on an early VIN tii would be like peeing on the Mona Lisa - and I say that as a guy that appreciates creative, cool, brainy modifications to cool old cars... not just originality. A stock, healthy, properly tuned tii will haul at 90-100 mph for 7-8-11 hours at a time, humming along at 5000 rpm....and rev beautifully to it's 6400 redline. 

 

Just my thoughts. 

 

 

Edited by wegweiser

Paul Wegweiser

Wegweiser Classic BMW Services

Nationwide vehicle transport available

NEW WEBSITE! www.zenwrench.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I hear you, you didn't specify (price).......you could probably knock 80 cents off that at current.  Of course the Californiai jackwagons just passed ANOTHER friggin tax (gas tax) to pay for the "infrastructure lie" but then thats another story-so it won't be less going forward........I digress.  Back on task now.......aside from the fuel comment, what Paul said....

Edited by markmac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, wegweiser said:

I've had silly, 180hp 2002s with all the expensive go-faster parts in it.....and yet a bone stock, but properly tuned tii is still my preferred mode of hauling holy ass. 

Thank you for your input; I'll keep it in mind.

 

You're running 10:1 at sea level?  We lose 3% of air pressure per thousand feet- so I'm down 15% just sitting here, and it only goes up- that's why I'm wanting to turn the pressure up a little bit with some more compression...

Dave.

'76, totally stock. Completely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fuel octane rating is lowered for high altitudes as well.  Cylinder compression pressure is lower as noted due to lower atmospheric.  So compression ratios used at sea level are the same used at altitude - the gas octane rating can't handle higher ratios.

(Cylinder pressure is atmospheric in psia  x compression ratio.  Do the math - 5000 ft  is a little over 12 psia.)

A radiator shop is a good place to take a leak.

 

I have no idea what I'm doing but I know I'm really good at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, wegweiser said:

The stock injection is going to give you seamless, smooth, effortless, no-drama performance equal to - or better than most multiple carb set-ups, unless you go silly with hurling cash at it.... the last 10 horsepower will be the most expensive. It always is. While I applaud your idea about using 4 carbs - creativity is great - I think you'll be disappointed, unless you toss a $400 cam, $900 pistons, $500 flywheel, and other bits in to it. Even then - you'll have a $8000 engine making only 30% more horsepower that commands constant fiddling. 

 

US compression (9.0-9.5-ish) should be good for 91-93 east coast pump gas. I believe Euro compression on the early motors was 10:1, and that's what I run... but out west, I discovered ALL the fuel flat out sucks. Definitely watched my Ps and Qs with ignition timing the entire time I was out there.

 

Also - and just to throw this out there: a tii with it's original and complete, functioning engine is worth about 30% or more, when re-sale time comes. 

 

I've had silly, 180hp 2002s with all the expensive go-faster parts in it.....and yet a bone stock, but properly tuned tii is still my preferred mode of hauling holy ass. 

 

Embrace the original injection. Learn it. It's easy, but takes patience. Once it's set up - it can be absolutely goddamned bulletproof. If you want to tinker with multiple carbs (and hell yeah, they're fun and cool and make all the right noises.... I get it!) Find a non tii and sell this one to fund the hotrodding. :) Early plastic-runner tiis are special cars. There's a visceral driving difference to them, even when compared to late 72 metal runner cars. Trashing the injection on an early VIN tii would be like peeing on the Mona Lisa - and I say that as a guy that appreciates creative, cool, brainy modifications to cool old cars... not just originality. A stock, healthy, properly tuned tii will haul at 90-100 mph for 7-8-11 hours at a time, humming along at 5000 rpm....and rev beautifully to it's 6400 redline. 

 

Just my thoughts. 

 

 

 

Wow, Paul!  As Glen already said, beautifully-articulated.  Makes me want to buy a tii.  Oh, shoot: I already did!

 

Best regards,

 

Steve

 

1976 2002 Polaris, 2742541 (original owner)

1973 2002tii Inka, 2762757 (not-the-original owner)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...