JLENHAM 0 January 18, 2010 NM/NA and no comment. Well, except for the fact I don't like the no bumper look in front with out an air dam. http://charlotte.craigslist.org/ctd/1555571374.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
golf73 33 January 18, 2010 great attention to detail in the engine bay! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
roadhog0 355 2 Vehicles January 18, 2010 The engine bay scares me. I wonder whats under all that paint!? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MikeWooldridge 47 1 Vehicles January 18, 2010 I'll never understand...why would you attempt to get top dollar when the small details go unattended? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rover1 33 January 18, 2010 iv never seen body work like that in the area below the tail lights. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Apexhntr 0 January 20, 2010 The car just looks weird with the wide tires they raised it up too high to gain wheel clearance. Then by removing the bumpers made it look slab sided and truck like. The engine bay does nothing to help one find something redeeming. Here are a few photos of a different approach: The car is greatly lowered Zender flares were used to widen the stance Note the integration of the rear exhaust. Note:low ground clearance approx 4 inches Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgerock 1,961 2 Vehicles January 21, 2010 As they say... Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (or owner). Different strokes for different folks. This car isn't what I would like, but someone does. Note the reflection of the "Visitor" space marking in the door. From those pictures the exterior paint looks really nice. Rear exhaust is slightly offset. Unusual rear valence treatment. Needs work under the bonnet. Maybe the owner ran out of $ on the exterior before they could get to the engine bay. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
