Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was just reading through C.D.iesel's 32/36 prescription, and noticed he says to "install a new mechanical advance distributor". Does that instruction hold true for stock engines as well? I had thought that the vacuum advance was better for a stock engine, and that you only wanted the mech. advance with higher compression and a hotter cam.

What's the verdict?

Aaron Heinrich

Portland, OR

'72 Sahara

http://www.flickr.com/photos/heinrich02/

Posted
I was just reading through C.D.iesel's 32/36 prescription, and noticed he says to "install a new mechanical advance distributor". Does that instruction hold true for stock engines as well? I had thought that the vacuum advance was better for a stock engine, and that you only wanted the mech. advance with higher compression and a hotter cam.

What's the verdict?

That is all true, but insignificant. You can't tell the difference without a dyno, a correctly timed mechanical distributor will be just fine.

Tom

Something always leaks.

Posted

correct-toe-mund0 Trent,

bottom line - a new mechanical distributor

produced tons of smooth pulling power,

steady firing of all 4 cylinders.

Toss out that 30 year old , worn out, uneven

firing, inoprative advancing vac-distributor.

'86 R65 650cc #6128390 22,000m
'64 R27 250cc #383851 18,000m
'11 FORD Transit #T058971 28,000m "Truckette"
'13 500 ABARTH #DT600282 6,666m "TAZIO"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...