Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

40 DCOE Synchronization, HELP!!


Recommended Posts

don't forget to check for vacuum leaks at the other end of the servo hose, the one way valve and around the servo. My 1600-2 ran like a pig when I bought it - the previous owner had misassembled the remote servo so #4 runner was just sucking air.

 

I'd temporarily plug it to rule any problems out.

Edited by NickVyse
  • Like 1

 

avaTour2.jpg.52fb4debc1ca18590681ac95bc6f527f.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If carburetor #1 is showing a HIGHER number on the syncrometer than the other 2 carburetors you are flowing MORE air THROUGH the carburetor.  An air leak at the manifold or even the brake booster would cause LESS air to go through the carb not more.  If the other 2 carbs are running correctly you have a problem with the linkage and the #1 carb is open too much. What type of linkage are you using between the carbs?  

1970 1602 (purchased 12/1974)

1974 2002 Turbo

1988 M5

1986 Euro 325iC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/1/2023 at 2:26 PM, Preyupy said:

If you are getting a different reading between the 2 throats of the same carburetor someone has bent the throttle shaft in the process of installing the linkage arm.  The only way to fix it is to bend it back.  People like to put a wrench on the nut on one side of the carburetor while they tighten the one on the other side. You basically need to reverse this process to get them even again.  It will take some trial and error.  

Errrr.........what if it turns out to be something else....?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check the position of your "butterflies" in the progression hole viewing port. Your throttle plates should be lined up under the first progression hole, if all adjusted correctly. If not, then you have a problem with in carb or carb to carb alignment.

Edited by Chris_B

Chris B.

'73 ex-Malaga

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Hans said:

Errrr.........what if it turns out to be something else....?

 

well, that's the 'joy' of troubleshooting, isn't it?  The thing is, there are a thousand little 

'wtf is that?' things that can go wrong, and to spot them, the car's gotta be sitting right in

front of you (or even on top of you) and staring you in the face.

And there are lots of clues that aren't visual, too, like the way it drops back to idle, the

way the shafts feel when moving, what happens when you block each

throat in succession, yadda et yadda de yadda...

 

And then there's the thing you haven't seen before that, once you see it, you say-

'well, duh, obviously THAT would do it' but it's nothing that would occur to mention

over the interwebs.

 

Since Hal's not all over this thread, there's not a whole lot we can do but say

'this is what's gotten me in the past, and here's how I've found it'

and leave him to it!  Since he's the one with the car in his face...

 

t

 

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TobyB said:

 

well, that's the 'joy' of troubleshooting, isn't it?  The thing is, there are a thousand little 

'wtf is that?' things that can go wrong, and to spot them, the car's gotta be sitting right in

front of you (or even on top of you) and staring you in the face.

And there are lots of clues that aren't visual, too, like the way it drops back to idle, the

way the shafts feel when moving, what happens when you block each

throat in succession, yadda et yadda de yadda...

 

And then there's the thing you haven't seen before that, once you see it, you say-

'well, duh, obviously THAT would do it' but it's nothing that would occur to mention

over the interwebs.

 

Since Hal's not all over this thread, there's not a whole lot we can do but say

'this is what's gotten me in the past, and here's how I've found it'

and leave him to it!  Since he's the one with the car in his face...

 

t

 

t:

Agreed, but before I start twisting my spindle (so to speak), I 'd want to be sure I'd eliminated everything else. Hard to back up on that manoeuver.

 

As I understand it, he swapped #1 carb and got same results. That would suggest it's perhaps not the #1 carb. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, John76 said:

My thought too.

What are the chances of two DCOEs producing identical symptoms only on the first manifold?

 

<0.

  • Like 1

If everybody in the room is thinking the same thing, then someone is not thinking.

 

George S Patton 

Planning the Normandy Break out 1944

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s what I was saying. 2 carbs with identical calibrations, swapped into position 1 (cylinders 1&2 ) both can pull 10s.  The untouched two rear carbs for cylinders 3-4 and 5-6 both pull only 6s.

 

I’d be figuring why the rear two aren’t flowing 10s — but I guess you could try getting the carb in position 1 to flow 6s.

 

All cylinders look great at the head and the bottom end has no cyl 1&2 versus 3-6 variations.

 

He verified the progression holes.

 

manifold or booster leaks, binding or uneven linkage, or reverse-twisted spinlidges… :D

Edited by visionaut

Where we goin’? … I’ll drive…
There are some who call me... Tom too         v i s i o n a u t i k s.com   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bastard.  Now I really hate him*.

 

So maybe there's an air leak on the back 2 carbs?  That's the same?  That's waaaayyyy odd.

 

The thingus is, it should be easy to idle down any particular carb to no airflow, and if it's

not, then SOMETHING is up with that position.  Usually linkage, if it tracks.

But that should be super obvious...

I have found that DCOEs are very physical beasts- as in, I always had to manipulate them 

to really understand what they were doing.  Looking didn't tell the whole story.

Twisting screws and bolts and jets and stuff was far more informative... and educational...

 

t

*just kidding.  Horribly jelly, though.

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really want to thank everyone for the great ideas in troubleshooting this very odd problem.  As @ray_ mentioned,  Mid-America 02 Fest consumed much of my time last week and, thus,  I have had no chance to test any theories because, paraphrasing @TobyB, I didn't "have the car in my face!"

 

It will take me a while to catch up on orders and correspondence, but I will once again have the car in my face to check out some of the possibilities proposed.  As I mentioned in the original post, I had already tried many of the proposed solutions before writing up the request for help, but I will start over with the basic setup before proceeding with some of the other more exotic possibilities.

 

While down in Eureka Springs I did check with some DCOE pros and received suggestions ranging from "It's the cam!" to "Impossible!"  Terry Sayther very sagely suggested I take to heart Sherlock Holmes famous adage that "when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."

 

Thank you everyone again and I'll inform the group when I have resolved the "improbable truth".

  • Like 5

BMWCCA  Member #14493

www.2002sonly.com

1086238739_Logoforsignature.png.eb1354ab9afa7c378cd15f33e4c7fbbe.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...