Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Correct Rod Bearing Inspection Procedure


Go to solution Solved by BarbaratheIrish2002,

Recommended Posts

I want to preface this by saying engine is still in the car, oil pump and oil pan are removed, subframe is lowered.  

 

I have a Haynes manual but it's short on detail for rod bearing inspection. What is the correct procedure?

 

Specifically, where should the piston in the cylinder in question be? TDC? A little below TDC

 

Is it a simple matter of undoing the two end-cap nuts, removing the end-cap, inspecting the bearing, checking the crankshaft at that point and then retorquing both endcap nuts before moving onto the next cylinder? For this initial visual inspection, I just want to have a look at the lower half rod bearings.

 

This may seem like a blatantly obvious question to ask, but I trialed the removal on cylinder one using this technique (while cylinder one was at TDC), the nuts came off, the end cap is loose and shaking about a little but try as I might, I could not get it to come all the way off. Also, at TDC, the piston is obviously as far up into the cylinder as it goes, making the removal of the endcap that much more difficult...but I did see elsewhere it's not a good idea to have the piston all the way at the bottom of its stroke either, lest some rings let go. 

 

Anyway, maybe I just need to be rougher with the removal of the end cap...but maybe there's another trick I'm missing out on. 

 

Again, thanks in advance for something that is likely bread and butter knowledge to you all, but it's a learning experience everyday for me with the M10!

Edited by BarbaratheIrish2002
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The crank position really doesn't make much difference, I would avoid hard tdc or bdc because sometimes a bit of crank rotation can help free the cap. Otherwise what ever allows the best access to the rod cap.   

  • Like 2

If everybody in the room is thinking the same thing, then someone is not thinking.

 

George S Patton 

Planning the Normandy Break out 1944

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use BDC and a BFH.

 

Take the BFH and use the end of the handle to tap on the studs 

to break the cap loose.  The studs have a centering diameter up

towards the top, and this is a slight interference fit sometimes.

 

I start with #3, as it's usually the worst news.

 

Cleanliness matters in this process.

 

TLA's FTW!

 

t

 

  • Like 1

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am by no means an expert, but my thought is to throw some plastigauge between the bearing and crank to check the clearance.  The bearings and crank might look good, but be worn too far.  This will let you know if there is more work to be done.  OK experts, let me know if I'm not thinking about this right.

Karl B.

1974 2002tii Malaga ("Conrad") -->> Conrad's Restoration Blog

2003 330i ZHP 6-spd

2011 328i xDrive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, BarbaratheIrish2002 said:

I just want to have a look at the lower half rod bearings.

Not sure I understand your motivation here...

Visual insp won't tell you much unless there is severe wear or damage of some sort.

Plastigauge is cheap and can be helpful in determining clearance/wear.

Also, with a bit more careful effort you could install new rod bearing shells, you're already in there.

Edited by tech71

76 2002 Survivor

71 2002 Franzi

85 318i  Doris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, TobyB said:

Take the BFH and use the end of the handle to tap on the studs 

to break the cap loose.  The studs have a centering diameter up

towards the top, and this is a slight interference fit sometimes.

 

I start with #3, as it's usually the worst news.

 

Thanks @TobyB. Two questions...

 

What is BFH?

Why generally is #3 the worst? Some sort of design oil flow issue?

Edited by BarbaratheIrish2002
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, tech71 said:

Not sure I understand your motivation here...

@tech71 Yesterday, as the sunlight was beating into the garage just right, I noticed that there were a small amount of reddish specks in the very bottom of the oil pan. Very small amount. To the point it could be something else, or, it could be copper from a ruined rod bearing. I want to see (visually) if the rod bearing surfaces have degraded to that point. I'm not going to the work of pulling the top half bearings if the bottom ones are ruined (then I've a much bigger problem on my hands that'll require much more work!!). Pulling the top have ones increases my risk of scratching the crankshaft surface and making the whole thing worse. And it offers no more insight that what I'm after. The bottom ones are easier to remove (and someone can correct me if I'm wrong, generally have more wear?). 

Edited by BarbaratheIrish2002
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BFH=Big f---ing hammer.  Or you can use a small copper or rawhide mallet to tap the rod bearing cap loose.  They are--and should be--a tight fit.  Just be sure and replace it (and its bearing) in the same location (i.e. don't swap ends). 

 

Number 3 is the last bearing to receive oil from the gallery, as #4 is fed from a gallery that doesn't include 1, 2, and 3.  IIRC it's fed from the same oil gallery that supplies the camshaft and rockers, from the rear of the engine, while the front three rods get their oil from a gallery at the engine's front end.

 

Plastigage will tell you if there's excessive wear; your Mk 1 fingernail will tell you if there's excessive scoring on the journals.

 

From experience with my '73, after dismantling the 204k mile engine, crank journals were well within tolerance for standard sized bearings.  I only swapped cranks because I had another with no measurable wear that had already been polished.  I kept the original crank to replace the 6 bolt crank/flywheel when I have to rebuild it.

  • Like 1

'69 Nevada sunroof-Wolfgang-bought new
'73 Sahara sunroof-Ludwig-since '78
'91 Brillantrot 318is sunroof-Georg Friederich 
Fiat Topolini (Benito & Luigi), Renault 4CVs (Anatole, Lucky Pierre, Brigette) & Kermit, the Bugeye Sprite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike, ya stole my thunder!

 

I like a visual inspection, too, as the upper shell tells a 

story of the conrod, detonation, and oil change interval.

And at that point, a new set of rod bearings is a quick and

cheap 'refresh' unless the old ones are brand- new looking.

And measuring.  As of last month, a set of KS rod bearings

were both available and priced well.

 

But then I usually just cut to the chase, yard the engine, measure

and replace the pistons, and whups, it's a full overhaul.

 

t

  • Like 1

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a related question for the experts in this area.  I need to swap in the special center main cap that supports the oil pump pickup on the M10 to my S14 motor.  Is is as easy as unbolting the S14 center main cap, removing the bearing shell, installing it in the special M10 main cap, and bolting it back in the S14 with the longer M10 main cap bolts?  Are there other things to consider?

 

Thanks,

 

Mark92131

  • Confused 1

1970 BMW 1600 (Nevada)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...