Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Weber 32/36 fuel inlet on wrong side


walkinfool

Recommended Posts

After years with the same weber 32/36 and non-operational water choke (and thus rough cold starts), I'm converting to a manual choke Weber. I ordered one through Pierce Manifold and unfortunately, didn't realize that the fuel inlet is on the passenger side. It's press fit and so moving it to the driver side is not a trivial task and would require me to tap the other side and find a threaded fuel inlet. So, I'd like to find either a pre-bent rubber fuel line or use a U-shaped fuel metal elbow to avoid kinking the rubber line. Has anyone already experienced this and if so, what was your solution?

 

many thanks,

Mitchell 

'72 Malaga 23Mar1972

'72 Malaga 11Jul1972
'09 Impreza
'11 Specialized hybrid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand your concern, but I wonder if there isn't a way to gently twist the fuel hose to achieve a smooth flowing curve.

 

Another member posted this photo recently.  I sort of like the way the hose is kept in tight to the head, instead of running out and around the way most do (mine does).  I do understand your kinking concern and went looking for that in this photo as soon as I noticed the right-side nipple.

IMG_1646.JPG

 

 


Drilling and tapping the cover, Weber uses m10 x 1.0 straight threads and an aluminum crush washer on the brass fitting.  

That thread requires that the hole be tapped perpendicular to the surface, so it seals.  I guess that's what spot facers are for.

 

Tapered taps seal with the threads, so no washer is needed, but torque is required to seal it and stretching/cracking can happen if the fitting is removed/installed repeatedly.  (Probably why they used straight threads).

 

I'd imagine you'd be drilling and tapping both sides, so you could put a plug in the right side hole;  but that is a bit of farting around, with taps/plugs/fittings to buy.

 

 

I don't know about fuel lines with built in curves.  Seems like a reasonable solution, if you can find one.  Adding bent tubing means two more hose clamps and starts seeming busy.

 

Is the lid from your old carb compatible, or do they differ with choke styles?  Maybe you could move that one over, for a Fronkensteen approach.

 

Tom

 

EDIT, this is the thread that photo came from.  It discusses another issue, having to do with the size of the outlet nipple on the pump being smaller than the one on the carb.

 

 

 

There is one other commonly discussed topic and that's fuel filter placement (before or after pump) and putting it between the pump and carb is tricky, with the nipple on the right.  One thing that bugs me is when a plastic fuel line is installed in a curved piece of fuel hose and it starts to take that shape as the plastic deforms.  They're probably durable enough to tolerate some distortion, but it just looks like a fuel fire waiting to happen.

 

 

Edited by '76mintgrün'02
  • Like 1

   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, '76mintgrün'02 said:

I understand your concern, but I wonder if there isn't a way to gently twist the fuel hose to achieve a smooth flowing curve.

 

Another member posted this photo recently.  I sort of like the way the hose is kept in tight to the head, instead of running out and around the way most do (mine does).  I do understand your kinking concern and went looking for that in this photo as soon as I noticed the right-side nipple.

IMG_1646.JPG

 

 


Drilling and tapping the cover, Weber uses m10 x 1.0 straight threads and an aluminum crush washer on the brass fitting.  

That thread requires that the hole be tapped perpendicular to the surface, so it seals.  I guess that's what spot facers are for.

 

Tapered taps seal with the threads, so no washer is needed, but torque is required to seal it and stretching/cracking can happen if the fitting is removed/installed repeatedly.  (Probably why they used straight threads).

 

I'd imagine you'd be drilling and tapping both sides, so you could put a plug in the right side hole;  but that is a bit of farting around, with taps/plugs/fittings to buy.

 

 

I don't know about fuel lines with built in curves.  Seems like a reasonable solution, if you can find one.  Adding bent tubing means two more hose clamps and starts seeming busy.

 

Is the lid from your old carb compatible, or do they differ with choke styles?  Maybe you could move that one over, for a Fronkensteen approach.

 

Tom

Hi and thanks for attaching the pic. when i was mocking my fuel line up, it seemed like it was going to be a tighter turn but this definitely looks and seems like a better solution than using a metal elbow and a few extra hose clamps. 

best,

Mitch

'72 Malaga 23Mar1972

'72 Malaga 11Jul1972
'09 Impreza
'11 Specialized hybrid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll just take a look online and see who makes an 8mm to 6mm reducer. I currently have 8mm fuel line at the fuel pump and really had to tighten it down to prevent it from leaking. 

'72 Malaga 23Mar1972

'72 Malaga 11Jul1972
'09 Impreza
'11 Specialized hybrid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, walkinfool said:

I'll just take a look online and see who makes an 8mm to 6mm reducer. I currently have 8mm fuel line at the fuel pump and really had to tighten it down to prevent it from leaking. 

 

Does adding a reducer mean two more clamps and a chunk of smaller fuel line?  That seems like it'd make it more difficult to make the nice sweeping curve between the pump and the carb.  Take a look at the link I posted above.  It shows another option.

 

On the topic of fuel lines, have you pulled the passenger side trunk board and inspected the hoses under there?


Tom

   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Tom, okay I had time to look at the link and the sleeve makes the perfect sense because as you noted, there would be additional hose clamps with the reducer option. I'll have a look at the hoses as you suggested in the trunk.

 

best,

mitch

'72 Malaga 23Mar1972

'72 Malaga 11Jul1972
'09 Impreza
'11 Specialized hybrid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been running a manual choke Weber 32/36 since 1979 or 1980, when my OEM Solex 2 barrel's fast idle cam died, and a new choke assembly cost more than a whole Weber.  To tell the truth, I never noticed that the fuel inlet was on the "wrong" side; I just used a piece of fuel line long enough to effect a gentle curve from pump to carb.  No problems...yet.

 

mike

'69 Nevada sunroof-Wolfgang-bought new
'73 Sahara sunroof-Ludwig-since '78
'91 Brillantrot 318is sunroof-Georg Friederich 
Fiat Topolini (Benito & Luigi), Renault 4CVs (Anatole, Lucky Pierre, Brigette) & Kermit, the Bugeye Sprite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Mike Self said:

I've been running a manual choke Weber 32/36 since 1979 or 1980, when my OEM Solex 2 barrel's fast idle cam died, and a new choke assembly cost more than a whole Weber.  To tell the truth, I never noticed that the fuel inlet was on the "wrong" side; I just used a piece of fuel line long enough to effect a gentle curve from pump to carb.  No problems...yet.

 

mike

Mike, I think you're out of the woods with regard to problems haha. Okay, it sounds like I should be able to create a gentle curve with a long enough piece of fuel line and will be back in the garage this weekend. Thanks,

Mich

'72 Malaga 23Mar1972

'72 Malaga 11Jul1972
'09 Impreza
'11 Specialized hybrid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...