Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Wheel Fitment Question


diondiv

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

 

Just wanted to get peoples thoughts on the following - still getting up to speed with fitment (have read through many threads on here). 

 

I have a 74 tii with 185/70 13 x 5 inch steelies (ET29) at the moment. I have the opportunity to purchase some 14 x 6.5 inch e30 basketweaves with 195/65 tires and ET30 fitment. (I thought i'd change the rubber to 195/60).

 

Question – looking at a wheel comparison, will I need spacers to push the tire outwards and if so how big? Does anyone else run these on their tii's? 

 

Cheers & thank you!

 

Dion

wheel fitment.jpg

Edited by diondiv

'74 Verona tii

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With stock fenders you'll want the tire/wheel in as far as possible to have the best clearance at the fender lip.

6.5" wheel is really 7.5 over all width.  So back space is 7.5/2 + 1.18" (30mm) = 4.93"

You will likely need a small 1/8" or 3/16" spacer to keep the tire off the strut.

A 195 tire should be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, diondiv said:

 

... Does anyone else run these on their tii's?

 


tii’s and non-tii’s have the same bodies.  Whatever works on one generally works on the other. I say “generally” because there are differences from car to car — un-related to the fuel delivery system — that make each and every ‘02 slightly “individual”.  Some of these might be factory tolerances, but many of these differences arise from use, accidents, repairs, etc., a.k.a., “the car’s history”! In short, a combination that works perfectly on another member’s car — assuming you are pushing the size limits — may or may not fit perfectly on your car.

 

Regards,

 

Steve

 

Edited by Conserv
  • Like 2

1976 2002 Polaris, 2742541 (original owner)

1973 2002tii Inka, 2762757 (not-the-original owner)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Conserv said:


tii’s and non-tii’s have the same bodies. 

 

Body and geometry same same but tii got bigger front caliper which will foul on some wheels that will fit carburated 02s

  • Like 1

'59 Morris Minor, '67 Triumph TR4A, '68 Silver Shadow, '72 2002tii, '73 Jaguar E-Type,

'73 2002tii w/Alpina mods , '74 2002turbo, '85 Alfa Spider, '03 Lotus Elise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, dlacey said:

Body and geometry same same but tii got bigger front caliper which will foul on some wheels that will fit carburated 02s


Oops! Good point! I’ve never seen a rim larger than 13”, say 14” or 15”, that had a problem with the factory tii calipers. But then — also a part of each car’s individual history — there are lots of post-factory “big brake” installations, on tii’s and non-tii’s, that will create havoc even with rims larger than 13”.  I was focused solely on fender/ inner fender/ suspension fitment, and neglected the critical brake issue! Thank you for noting this.

 

Best regards,

 

Steve

 

1976 2002 Polaris, 2742541 (original owner)

1973 2002tii Inka, 2762757 (not-the-original owner)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They might be too close for comfort. I changed to 195/60R14 on BMW Basketweave 14" x 6.5 " Ran them for about a year but eventually added 5mm spacers since the clearance was about 1/16 or less and I wasn't comfortable with the tight clearance.

 

image.png.4dbedef25ace58659b559652209f910d.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...