Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Wideband sensor location


Recommended Posts

If your goal relates to tii tuning, you’ll want to read the following thread:

 

 

Borrowed from the above thread are some examples (below) of bung locations, although the photos are really meant to accompany the text!

 

Regards,

 

Steve

 

DA976E6D-473F-4743-9838-76FF92612AA8.jpeg

842131DC-E9E7-4A9A-A3D7-1D335A3F8672.jpeg

833E6179-B3F4-4DCD-9B9D-CE739BB066CA.jpeg

  • Like 1

1976 2002 Polaris, 2742541 (original owner)

1973 2002tii Inka, 2762757 (not-the-original owner)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read installation notes for the Bosch 4.9 sensor that recommends a 10 degree minimum angle above horizontal to prevent any liquid coming into contact with the probe.

  • Like 1

Koboldtopf - '67 1600-2

Einhorn - '74 tii

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BarrettN said:

a 10 degree minimum angle above horizontal to prevent any liquid coming into contact with the probe.

 

4 hours ago, roman.lysiak said:

Thanks guys.

 

I see some pics with horizontal sensors.  I would worry that the sensor will burn out prematurely.  Angled is required to shed moisture. 

 

Vertical is really good, but more hassle to re&re.  IMHO. ?

Edited by PaulTWinterton

73 Inka Tii #2762958

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PaulTWinterton said:

Vertical is really good, but more hassle to re&re.  IMHO. ?

 

Hi Paul!

 

I see little to no difference in difficulty based on horizontal vs. vertical positioning.  (I like having it tucked up out of harm's way).

 

The one I have feeds info to an Innovate LC-1 AFR gauge and it requires calibration in the open air before installation; after the first 500 miles and then annually, according to the instructions.

 

I pulled it out for the first re-calibration a couple of months ago and it was not a big deal.  I just spun up the wires counter-clockwise before spinning it back in.

015.thumb.JPG.bc15e1259cf92aeb9c8e7d8001d98425.JPG

 

On the Innovate site, they discuss bung length and claim that there is no need to dangle the sensor way out into the exhaust stream.  They say that doing so can lead to overheating/failure and suggest using a one inch long bung.

 

https://www.diyautotune.com/product/innovate-motorsports-extended-o2-sensor-bung-3764/ 

 

Here are some tips about extending the life of the sensor --

 

http://blog.innovatemotorsports.com/important-tips-to-get-the-maximum-life-out-of-your-o2-sensor/

 

Here's a quote about calibrating the sensor -- (fwiw)

 

Why do I need to calibrate the O2 sensor with Innovate products?

The answer is simple.....Accuracy!

 

Innovate Motorsports is the only wideband O2 device manufacturer on the market that allows the user to field calibrate the O2 sensor. Our patented sensor calibration allows compensation for the two main causes of inaccurate air/fuel ratio data; sensor wear and altitude. The alternative to calibrating your sensor in the field is to rely on the sensor’s Bosch factory calibration. The Bosch factory sensor calibration is done using a fixed atmospheric pressure value that may be incorrect for your location from the start!

   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PaulTWinterton said:

I see some pics with horizontal sensors.  I would worry that the sensor will burn out prematurely.  Angled is required to shed moisture. 

 

I've had my sensors horizontal for many decades, although the LM-11 uses an internal heater so water vapor shouldn't be a problem.

 

So I guess it comes down to which type of sensor you are using.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...