Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Hose Set for tii


David Layton

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, Son of Marty said:

The real advantage of the silicone set is they will last much longer than the rubber set and they can be cleaned easily if thats important to you.

 

The downside — and this is purely my opinion, not fact — is the appearance of silicone hoses: slick and shiny. I, for one, believe that “flexible” and visible automotive components — my definition of “flexible” here embraces rubber and silicon hoses — should not be shiny, like painted metal components. My tires, for instance, are black, but they are not shiny. And my hoses are black, but not shiny. I may be in a minority, but I would view a silicone hose as out of character in a 50-year-old car.

 

I won’t dispute the longevity of silicone hoses, although I’ve yet to see a 40-year-old silicone hose, whereas I’ve seen 40-year-old rubber hoses still in use.... ?

 

So, are there forum members here who see rubber hoses failing in five years? Ten years? Mine tend to last a long time, much longer than most people keep most cars. And how long are you going to keep your car? Is the buyer going to love your silicone hoses, or not?

 

My input....

 

The photos below reflect my aesthetic, YAMV (“Your Aesthetic May Vary”)! Check out my dull XAS’s...

 

Regards,

 

Steve

 

DEB306F3-6A56-4B5C-B8DC-2E072B160F31.jpeg

2B738289-C6DE-4D56-AC32-4D977B9DC230.jpeg

Edited by Conserv
  • Like 4

1976 2002 Polaris, 2742541 (original owner)

1973 2002tii Inka, 2762757 (not-the-original owner)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also with Steve I prefer the rubber look over the shinny or colored hoses but thats  my opinion and if I did get a car with silicone hoses I'd just leave them on the car, I know that silicon hoses last many hundreds of thousand of mile on semi trucks but 02 have much lower underhood temps than most new cars and the way most are used these days, IE weekend drives, most of the real advantages of silicon are moot. 

 

PS  when I drove my 02's as daily drivers and track days I did change the hoses about every 5 years.

Edited by Son of Marty

If everybody in the room is thinking the same thing, then someone is not thinking.

 

George S Patton 

Planning the Normandy Break out 1944

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, jerryasi said:

my question is to Conserv, whose relay rack did you use under hood?

 

That’s the factory 4-slot relay rack that came on all square taillight cars (1974 models through the end of 1502 production in 1977). Three slots were filled from the factory (low beam, high beam, and horn) unless you had factory-installed fog lights (the latter was not available from the factory on U.S.-spec cars). I have fog lights, and driving lights, now. I use the extra slot for the fog lights and there is a fifth relay mounted to the inner fender, just below the relay rack.

 

Regards,

 

Steve

 

Edited by Conserv

1976 2002 Polaris, 2742541 (original owner)

1973 2002tii Inka, 2762757 (not-the-original owner)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, PaulTWinterton said:

 

No.  Most of my replacement hoses are near 20 years old, but I admit they aren't overly abused.

 

I'm with you Steve.  I prefer the stock rubber look.

 

I go through the pain every ~5ish years with stock rubber along with replacing my KF belt. 

PM is preferred to the side of the road. 

 

Colin K.

Malaga '72 tii

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ColinK said:

 

I go through the pain every ~5ish years with stock rubber along with replacing my KF belt. 

PM is preferred to the side of the road. 

 

 

Wow, Colin,

 

Would you consider yourself fairly risk-averse, or have you witnessed actual failures of hoses and KF belts within five-ish years?

 

Best regards,

 

Steve

 

1976 2002 Polaris, 2742541 (original owner)

1973 2002tii Inka, 2762757 (not-the-original owner)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the silicone hoses, has anybody scuffed them up a bit to diminish the sheen? 

 

I got an IE set for my tii. I am currently on the performance/durability mode for our rallies. I'll look under the hood and go "Good, good, good..." rather than "Correct, correct, correct."  If the body ever gets repaired and painted I might revert back to bone-stock. 

Edited by SteveJ

Steve J

72 tii / 83 320is / 88 M3 / 08 MCS R55 / 12 MC R56

& too many bikes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveJ said:

With the silicone hoses, has anybody scuffed them up a bit to diminish the sheen? 

 

Perhaps there is a flat/matte paint one could use on the silicone hoses.

John in VA

'74 tii "Juanita"  '85 535i "Goldie"  '86 535i "M-POSSTR"  

'03 530i "Titan"  '06 330ci "ZHPY"

bmw_spin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Conserv said:

The downside — and this is purely my opinion, not fact — is the appearance of silicone hoses: slick and shiny. I, for one, believe that “flexible” and visible automotive components — my definition of “flexible” here embraces rubber and silicon hoses — should not be shiny, like painted metal components. My tires, for instance, are black, but they are not shiny. And my hoses are black, but not shiny. I may be in a minority, but I would view a silicone hose as out of character in a 50-year-old car.

 

+ 1 on non-shiny hoses

 

8 hours ago, Conserv said:

The photos below reflect my aesthetic, YAMV (“Your Aesthetic May Vary”)! Check out my dull XAS’s...

 

+1 on non-shiny size correct / period correct tyres with tubes (XAS on left, Sumitomo on right).

 

IMG_3814.thumb.JPG.796ba52a835440c403a72a860d167a4f.JPG 

 

 

  • Like 1

Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.

Benjamin Franklin

73 tii (Verona, survivor, owned since '92)

66 DS21 (most technologically advanced car of the 20th Century)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Conserv said:

 

Wow, Colin,

 

Would you consider yourself fairly risk-averse, or have you witnessed actual failures of hoses and KF belts within five-ish years?

 

Best regards,

 

Steve

 

 

I am risk averse.

The only time I was stranded was when my KF belt broke back ~'78 (may have been the original belt) and yes I keep a trunk full of spares. 

I've had the heater hose leak when I lived in So Ca (Venice area) so they got included in the that rotation. 

I also change the fuel filter every couple of years to avoid sputtering down the road. Regular fluid changes (brake and radiator) are all part it. 

Besides that, I have to skin my knuckles every so often.... 

I think I'm due for fuel lines but I need to check my maintenance log...

 

Colin 

  • Thanks 1

Colin K.

Malaga '72 tii

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeez, a year’s worth of engine bay grime is all it takes to dull the shine a little.

(Fit from IE is good, although I did have to call for one was missing, sent out no issues)

Now I wouldn’t do the blue hoses... that’s where I draw the line

7CA3AA27-F285-4C6C-A66E-32837CEF8811.jpeg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...