Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Bad Oil Analysis


john02md

Recommended Posts

'74 2002, 70,000 original, documented miles.  20w-50 Valvoline conventional oil.  At the past two 3,000-mile oil changes, I have sent a sample to Blackstone for analysis.  Each showed, much higher than average metal content (2 - 5 times higher) - iron, lead, aluminum.  The most recent was worst than the previous.  Blackstone says run new oil 2,000 mi and send them another sample, but also advises watch oil pressure and listen for unusual sounds.  Well that inspires no confidence.  The car runs well and sounds good.  It does use about a quart of oil per thousand miles and there's an occasional puff of smoke on deceleration, presumed to be valve guide/seals.  Compression check year ago was close to 155 all 4 cylinders.  Oil pressure seems normal:

Light out within a couple seconds of cold start

VDO gauge shows:

cold fast idle 60 psi

warmed up engine 15 psi idle, 60 psi 3,000 rprm, about 75 psi 4,000 rpm

 

In the 4+ years I've owned the car, I drive it ocassionally and do roughly 3,000 mi a year.  In the 25-years prior to my purchase, it did only 10,000 miles.  A factor perhaps?

Also, in changing oil, I kept forgetting to grab the sample until near end of drain.  A factor?

Time for a tear down and analysis?

 

John

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't panic.  Do as they say if you haven't owned the car much beyond those two oil changes you may just be seeing a washout of stuff from it's past.  Your oil can have different detergent capabilities that that of the past.  It should settle down.

 

How is you air cleaner?  Any high levels of silicon?  If so, that's a result of abrasive dirt coming in thru the carb.

A radiator shop is a good place to take a leak.

 

I have no idea what I'm doing but I know I'm really good at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Jim says, don't panic. These engines are pretty long lived (especially the bottom ends) and if yours has been regularly maintained (which it sounds like) then you are unlikely to have any immediate problems. 

 

What i I would say is that you may need to check the ZDDP (zinc) content of your oil as there is some evidence that modern formulation oils with reduced amounts can see rapid wear of cams / rockers. This would be a good point for Toby to jump in as he has some experience with this. 

rtheriaque wrote:

Carbs: They're necessary and barely controlled fuel leaks that sometimes match the air passing through them.

My build blog:http://www.bmw2002faq.com/blog/163-simeons-blog/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Simeon said:

What i I would say is that you may need to check the ZDDP (zinc) content of your oil as there is some evidence that modern formulation oils with reduced amounts can see rapid wear of cams / rockers

20W-50 is excluded from the restriction on ZDDP. 10W-40 is also excluded.  The 5W-40 for European cars is not because the cars are EPA certified with the special spec oil.

A radiator shop is a good place to take a leak.

 

I have no idea what I'm doing but I know I'm really good at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comments.  In my ownership, 13,000 miles, this car has had several changes with 20w-50 Valvoline, but the two most recent are the only ones with oil analysis.  Silicon is slightly above average.  Air filter is stock sitting on an adapter for weber 32/36.  I have fashioned a foam interface to try to seal it tightly, so I doubt any significant dirt gets through.  All other elements at or below average, so the iron, aluminum and lead wear do seem puzzling. 

Also no coolant or fuel in oil sample. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes taking the sample at the end of the drain period will skew the readings especially with a car driven low miles every year the heavy particulates (iron and lead) tend to sink to the bottom of the oil pan and stick, then drain out with the last drips of oil, as stated above the bottom ends of the m10 are very stout and will generally give good warning if in distress. I also wonder if the recommended amounts they are using are geared towards a modern engine and not one 45 years old. 

If everybody in the room is thinking the same thing, then someone is not thinking.

 

George S Patton 

Planning the Normandy Break out 1944

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, perchance you have no oil cooler, right?

 

If so, pretty hard to change all the oil....

 

Also, what they said ^

 

Cheers,

Ray

Stop reading this! Don't you have anything better to do?? :P
Two running things. Two broken things.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 I also wonder if the recommended amounts they are using are geared towards a modern engine 

 

That's what popped into my head, too.

 

I wouldn't panic- 15psi hot with 20-50 is low- ish, but not tragic.  What's your idle RPM?

 

If it was mine, I'd pop the valve cover, look carefully at the cam and lash pads

(for your iron) and if they're ok (no scoring, troughing, etc) I'd just drive it.

 

Lead pretty much has to be bearings, and the bearings on an M10 are massively stout.  60 psi at 3000 is great for them

Don't lug the engine- as in, if it only has 20 psi at 1500, shift!

 

Aluminum is probably the oil pump housing, if it has the gearotor style.  Cam bearings, I suppose,

but they're pretty durable if the oil's changed regularly, as yours seems to be.

Pistons I suppose, but you're not hearing any slap, are you?

 

t

 

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Idle is 900 rpm.  Cam looked good last year when I adjusted valves.  I suppose I'll just drive and observe and see how the oil looks next year.  Thanks all for your comments. 

 

Blackstone Laboratories compares engines of similar types.  So mine is compared to M10s with an average of 3,300 miles on the oil.  I don't know how large their database is, but I periodically send them samples from my other BMWs and they always compare to similar engines.  Compared to my S52, and Blackstone's "universal" averages, for example, my M10 results would be really, really awful.  The test also shows how the oil is holding up, suggesting how long you can go between oil changes.  Obviously with the M10, the concern is wear, not oil longevity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sitting for long periods followed by "dry" starts can be a curse.  So can short runs or failing to run the engine to normal operating temperature before parking it.  This can be especially true if the engine has been fed a rich (cold start/choke on) mixture as this tends to promote oil contamination, among other detriments to long engine life.

 

Next time you change your oil, insert a cotton swab through the oil sump drain hole and gently "swab" the bottom of the pan.  You probably won't like what you see on the tip.  The pan bottom can be difficult to clean without physical intervention (removal).  Flushing the engine with light weight oil and solvents can rid the engine of considerable crud, but it rarely gets everything at the bottom.   This condition can tend to make fresh oil look prematurely "used" in short order.  Since you are diligent enough to perform routine oil analysis, you might consider removing the pan and cleaning it.  This might resolve lingering doubts about cross contamination of your oil samples.  Otherwise, you might consider driving for another 40 years before worrying (too much) about the consequences.

 

Edited by avoirdupois
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...