Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Brake set up question


Recommended Posts

I am in the process of trying to turn my garage art back into a car.  The car will be pretty stripped down and have 175 hp.  I'm trying to firm up the brake choice for the car.  It will see the occasional track day and autocross but mainly be a nice weather back road burner.

 

The setup I am currently considering is manual brakes, wilwood separate master cylinders.  With the 323i vented front rotors with wilwood calipers and for the rear the 250 mm drums.

 

I know with a track car you can never have too much brakes.  Would this be safe to get me on the road and enjoying the car.  The more exotic setup with much larger from rotors and rear discs is quite a bit more.  I like the idea of this setup because calipers excepted its all stuff I can replace at a local parts store or rockauto pretty easily.

 

Other pertinent information

15x7 wheels 

205/50r15 tires (200 treadwear in the future)

box flares

interior stripped to two seats, carpet, door cards, cage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, for a fast street/track car, you're just fine with the Volvo calipers and 250 rear drums.

  And owning several disc brake cars without boosters,

the 2002 booster is a very good, low boost compromise for the street. 

Unless you start really tracking it hard, you won't need the bias adjustability that dual masters gives you-

and you can do that with 22mm rear cylinders and a rear pressure limiter, too.

 

I raced on 320 front calipers and 77 rotors for 2 years, and they were 'good enough'- it's currently got the

528 calipers on it, and they're more than enough with Hawk Blues- which are very basic racing pads.

 

(of course, if you like the LOOK of the wilwoods, by all means do it.  It's just that you don't need them for braking reasons)

 

hth

 

t

 

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I partially agree with Toby.  Aside from the booster (which I would keep), your only difference from the standard setup is running the wilwood front calipers on the vented disks.  I like losing a couple pounds of unsprung weight and the general modernity of the wilwood calipers.  It's more than looks, but they certainly aren't game changers.  

 

If you look at vintage racers, nearly all have kept the stock booster (or have switched back to a stock booster).  Yes, boosterless is possible, but just not worth the trade off in my opinion.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the information.  I am kind of locked into losing the booster due to the engine swap.  I will be going to a wilwood pedal assembly.  As far as the calipers wilwoods aren't too much more compared to rebuilt stock type.  This car is not so much about looks as going quickly and being reliable and maintainable.  I will gladly trade a bit of speed for more track time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pick your master cylinder size carefully.  Without a booster your effort is going to be very high with 3/4" master cylinders, I would recommend either the 5/8" (0.625") or the 0.600".  You will increase the pedal travel a bit but loose a lot of pedal effort.  I am running a 19mm (3/4") dual master cylinder (its a Mercedes Benz part) mounted on a modified pedal bucket using the original pedals.  The effort is a bit high but it does not take long to get used to it, its much harder getting back into the street car after and NOT locking up the tires the first time you step on the brakes. 

1970 1602 (purchased 12/1974)

1974 2002 Turbo

1988 M5

1986 Euro 325iC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but the feel of a boosterless car on the track is almost worth it.  Until you get stuck in stop- and 45mph go in traffic...

 

If you're locked into the boosterless, then I totally agree with Byron- 5/8" masters are probably a good place to start.  Especially if you

can go with the overhung (longer, thus higher leverage) pedals.

 

t

 

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
14 minutes ago, FlyingPez said:

I recently saw on a build someone was doing on Instagram where they switched from the stock booster to the TII booster it was smaller in diameter. What change will that give you and does anyone sell them new?

 

Keith

The tii booster is just for allowing more space for the intake, and doesn't really give a performance advantage.  It's just longer and narrower.  Guys that have switched to sidedraft carbs often use them too so that they can have more room for velocity stacks.  I just let mine rub the stock booster though, hah.

Can't get 'em new anywhere, no.  Several guys have been attempting using similar boosters, but don't think there's  been a winner yet.

Edited by KFunk

Bring a Welder

1974 2002, 1965 Datsun L320 truck, 1981 Yamaha XS400, 1983 Yamaha RX50, 1992 Miata Miata drivetrain waiting on a Locost frame, 1999 Toyota Land Cruiser

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...