Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

EFI or Dual Webers


Recommended Posts

I am doing a restomod build on a 1974 2002 adding a 5 speed, Bilstein sport shocks, H&R lowering springs, ST sway bars, Wildwood big brakes front and rear, 15 x 7 Hartage wheels, E21 Recaro seats etc.  My last decision:  EFI/Megasquirt or dual Webers.  I would like the Forums opinions regarding drivability and performance not installation.  I have done several dual carb cars and there is a shop in my hometown that has done very successful Megasquirt installations for several friends of mine.  So I feel confident in regards to the installation and tuning of either system.    I want a quick street car with low end torque rather than a race car on the street.    Is 175 HP possiible?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you thinking for internals? Camshaft choice? Pistons/ what compression ratio? You're going to need think about these things beyond just webers or EFI if you want to see numbers like 175 hp

 

I can't yet comment on Drivability of DCOE's just yet, as I'm currently doing a top-end rebuild (no money for pistons/machining of the block yet) with DCOE 40's and a Schrick 292. From all the research and reading you can make them very streetable, but some people struggle with getting them setup properly and staying that way. I imagine if I get all the way down the road and my car's street manners aren't the best, I'll probably start lying to myself that it's great, because it's taken so much work/time/money/effort to get here, haha.

 

I'm no expert, but there's lots of those on here. With my setup as is, I would be very happy if I got 130-145hp. Your low end torque on DCOE's is going to come from your choke size, which is going to keep your peak HP lower. 

 

For 175, I imagine you're going to need a much more aggressive cam than my setup (316+?) DCOE 45's, and higher compression pistons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have webers 40's on my car, basically normal 2002 with Alpina set it to A1 about 1976. Needed to resize progression holes since gasoline has changed here in Europe. Once the jets are correct(it's a long way to get there if you have no experience). After 1000 miles I resync them and reset idle mixture screws. Takes about 30min with removing ti airfilter housing. Sync depends on your throttle linkage. But just to get you the right view, if you do not like to tweak every here and now, consider yourself not a weber person :)
EFI vs dual webers is basically almost the same, EFI better straigh from idle but webers get you better torque also better end HP if set correctly. If I put it how I felt friends EFI vs my webers, but if you like the growl just go for webers :)

Best regards

Blaz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fuel consumption will be better with the fuel injection.  webers do work nice with the M10 and will flow alot better than the single throttle body manifold also.  As stated above 175bhp streetable is doable, especialy if you have access to RON98 (MON93) fuel.  Cubic inches and high compression will help.  All parameters have to be matched.  No point having a big Schrick 304 with 8.5:1 compression, and having 11:1 with a small cam will be no good either.  High compression makes everything work, and has the effect of calming a large cam.

1974 2002 2.2stroker, DCOE45's, 300deg cam, 5 spd, 3.91 LSD // 1984 E24 M635csi, dogleg 5spd 3.23 LSD. // 1994 E34 540i, supercharged 16psi, 6spd E85 only, 3.15 LSD // 1997 E36 M3 Evo, low comp supercharged 18psi 6spd (under construction)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

restomod

 

You need a 4bbl Holley...

 

...sticking out the hood.  Maybe even that tiny blower from a Merc or Pontiac v6.

 

 

 

Seriously, if you care about how it looks and sounds, DCOEs.  If things like cold starting, mpg, emissions and tip- in throttle matter more, EFI.

 

t

 

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, RadicalRacing said:

   I want a quick street car with low end torque rather than a race car on the street.    Is 175 WHP possiible?

 

Yes it is possible, but there will be a long list of trick (re:expensive) things that will need implementing if you are looking for 175whp and a chubby torque curve.  Namely a beastly stroker bottom end (start looking for S14 parts), lot's of porting, and a fat cam up top.  HOWEVER, that would seem to contradict your stated goal of making a quick street car rather than a street-driven race car.

 

As for EFI vs. Webers; both can be setup to be drivable.  I'm with Toby, Holly and Blower.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want 175hp + lots of low-midrange torque + nice idle and drivability out of a 2 liter M10 you are going to need some kind of forced induction.  My recommendation is EFI and a turbo.  With lots of compression (you will  have a problem with detonation on pump fuel) you can see as much as 150 lb/ft of torque at the peak.  If that happens around 4500 rpm ( probably something like a 304 cam) it will fall off to around 130-135 lb/ft @6500 rpm that works out to 160-165 hp.  You will loose a lot of torque under 3000 rpm with that much cam plus to get that much air flow at the top end you will need at least 36mm chokes in the carbs which will also hurt the low and mid range drivability (EFI can help you get some of that back)  If you drop it down to a reasonable compression ratio so you can run 93 octane pump gas you are going to loose probably 10 lb/ft and 10 hp.  You can get your HP back by turning the engine to a higher rpm with a different cam but you are going to loose bottom end torque at the same time. 

 

Remember the engine is just a big air pump, the more air you move the more power you make.  HP is how many pounds of bricks you can move in a given amount of time.  Torque is how many bricks can you pick up at one time.  If you move 100 bricks 100 feet in 10 minutes you have expended X amount of HP, it does not matter if you make 50 trips with 2 bricks or 4 trips with 25 bricks. It's the difference between a 5liter V8 turning 2000 rpm and a 2liter 4 cylinder turning 5000rpm 

 

Like Andrew said you can always go for the increased displacement of a S14 EVO crankshaft and a 3 mm overbore and build yourself a 2300cc engine. 

1970 1602 (purchased 12/1974)

1974 2002 Turbo

1988 M5

1986 Euro 325iC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

BTW, what EFI are you considering.  There are huge differences between 320 injection, 318 injection, or individual throttle bodies.  If all is equal, EFI will be better as you are allowing a computer to control all aspects instead of vacuum in the carb and springs in the distributor. Expect to spend a lot more money on EFI vs carbs.

 

steve k.

Get your 2002 FAQ merchandise from 2002FAQ Store

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy here in Chico uses Megasquirt with individual throttles bodies and his custom made intake manifolds.  He said he can do his part for under $1500.   He charged a buddy of mine $1200 for the setup on his 1969 Toyota Corona 22 RE.  Of course I have to supply a good rebuilt engine.  I am still gathering information as to what pistons, crank, head and cam I will use.  Obviously I need the whole combination to work well together.    He says he can tune the Megasquirt to any engine I give him from mild to wild. 

 

Maybe 175 hp is too ambitious for carbs or straight EFI.   I have been looking at the Sprintex superchargers.  Met them at SEMA and was very impressed with their products, though they are quite expensive.  They have nothing specifically for a 2002 so air intake and manifold will have to be custom made.  If I decide on the Sprintex unit it seems best to go with EFI for the tuneability.

 

Is there any downside, other than cost,  to using a stroker crank with supercharging?

 

A few years ago I saw a video (don't remember if it was on TV or Youtube) showing some guys in Australia building a supercharged 2002.   Can't find it now.  

Edited by RadicalRacing
Mistyped Toyota motor model
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If u want 175hp.... Look into M20 swaps.  180hp stock.  200hp with light mods. 250-300 with forced induction.  LOTS of bolt on options.  Or a forced induction M42 if you want to stick with a 4 cylinder motor.

1976 BMW 2002 Fjord Blue Ireland Stage II • Bilstein Sports • Ireland Headers • Weber 38 • 292 Cam • 9.5:1 Pistons • 123Tune Bluetooth 15" BBS

2016 BMW 535i M Sport

1964 Volvo Amazon Wagon
http://www.project2002.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recently installed a hybrid S14/M10 (8-valve) engine in my 2002. Le Tran did an awesome job. 2.3L. Knife-edge crank, twin Dellorto DHLA 45, big valve head, Pete McHenry cam, MSD ignition. Tons of torque. Pulls like a freight train. 

Edited by jdeitch

1975 Polaris 2002 (RAT 02E), 1962 mini Cooper S

1994 Land Cruiser - expedition vehicle, 2012 VW Touareg TDI.
2002 restoration blog - http://rato2e.blogspot.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recently installed a hybrid S14/M10 (8-valve) engine in my 2002. Le Tran did an awesome job. 2.3L. Knife-edge crank, twin Dellorto DHLA 45, big valve head, Pete McHenry cam, MSD ignition. Tons of torque. Pulls like a freight train. 

Any pics?

'74 2002tii Amazon Green #2781677

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...