Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Recommended Posts

Posted

I assume you are shooting to not have the intermediate spring loaded rod and reach with the sensor alone, fixed in position.

A radiator shop is a good place to take a leak.

 

I have no idea what I'm doing but I know I'm really good at it.

Posted
4 hours ago, AustrianVespaGuy said:

. . . Yeah that's exactly what we're working on here, with the long pole in the tent being a sensor that can survive the environment. Once I validate that though. . .

PXL_20240717_132215614.thumb.jpg.52d62a5416609d06aa2de4d5a8978e73.jpg

 

Dude super cool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

 

  • Thanks 1

"Goosed" 1975 BMW 2002

 

Posted
5 hours ago, AustrianVespaGuy said:

. . . Yeah that's exactly what we're working on here, with the long pole in the tent being a sensor that can survive the environment. Once I validate that though. . .

PXL_20240717_132215614.thumb.jpg.52d62a5416609d06aa2de4d5a8978e73.jpg

 

 

Looking forward to updates on this-- very very clean!

Posted

So I've got about 80% confidence this will work so I went ahead and ordered the expensive DW-HD-621-m8-100 sensor:

https://www.automationdirect.com/adc/shopping/catalog/sensors_-z-_encoders/inductive_proximity_sensors/8mm_tubular/dw-hd-621-m8-100

It's got an IP67 rated 60mm SS body with 53mm of threads and rated up to 140C.  While I'd feel better if the prob end was also enclosed in the SS housing, it's at least a liquid crystal polymer (LCP) - like Kevlar, so about a good as plastic as you can get - so  I think this still *should* be good enough to survive tucked into the cylinder head.  I mean, they bolt lesser-plastic intakes to cylinder heads all the time, right?

Anyway, when the sensor gets here I'll be able to bench test it in short order however I won't be able to actually run it in the car for a while.  The head in the car currently is an E21 with no fuel pump hole, and the good one on my bench is an E12 which is waiting on the rebuilt bottom end to go in the car, which in turn is waiting on new Ross pistons I ordered via Ireland 4 months ago so. . . no clue how much longer that's all gonna take unfortunately.

Oh, and as for sealing the mounting, I just took a piece of the thick (I think 1/8") cork gasket sheet I had laying around and cut out a small section of it to mount the wire.  I think with a little RTV there to help seal the seams it should actually work great, with no extra machining of the block-off plate necessary!

PXL_20240717_131932120.thumb.jpg.b54641a9def751d4649ed708fec2eade.jpg

 

So, all good news so far, but afraid it'll be a while yet before I can provide any 'trial-by-fire' results, sorry. . . 😕

  • Like 1
Posted

Pardon my ignorance, but why do you need a cam sensor on a fix cam engine, isn't the cam  tied to the crank?

If everybody in the room is thinking the same thing, then someone is not thinking.

 

George S Patton 

Planning the Normandy Break out 1944

Posted
Just now, Son of Marty said:

Pardon my ignorance, but why do you need a cam sensor on a fix cam engine, isn't the cam  tied to the crank?

Fuel injection!

  • Like 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, 2002iii said:

Fuel injection!

Yes, but can't you take that off the crank also as the two are married?

If everybody in the room is thinking the same thing, then someone is not thinking.

 

George S Patton 

Planning the Normandy Break out 1944

Posted
1 minute ago, Son of Marty said:

Yes, but can't you take that off the crank also as the two are married?

Consider this: Set engine to #1 TDC, and then take the head off.  Now, which piston, 1 or 4 is on the compression stroke and which is on the exhaust stroke?

 

2012-09-2518_14_45.thumb.jpg.3b6bdc68bff58b44eacafbb75a7a8faf.jpg

 

While yes they're 'married,' cam turns at HALF crank speed, so for every crank position you have TWO possible cam positions, so we want a sensor to tell us which one of those two were at. Make sense?

  • Like 3
Posted
6 minutes ago, Son of Marty said:

Yes, but can't you take that off the crank also as the two are married?

They're married, but the crank does two rotations for every one rotation of the cam, so the fuel injection needs to know which half of the cycle we're on. 

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Son of Marty said:

Yes, but can't you take that off the crank also as the two are married?

It's some weird kind of ménage à trois.

 

henn

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

The cam sensor is a simple "flag" signal that tells the ECU to begin counting the firing order at one (i.e. reset the count of crankwheel teeth) after the missing teeth section of the wheel

  • Like 3

A radiator shop is a good place to take a leak.

 

I have no idea what I'm doing but I know I'm really good at it.

  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 7/19/2024 at 1:40 PM, AustrianVespaGuy said:

So I've got about 80% confidence this will work so I went ahead and ordered the expensive DW-HD-621-m8-100 sensor:

https://www.automationdirect.com/adc/shopping/catalog/sensors_-z-_encoders/inductive_proximity_sensors/8mm_tubular/dw-hd-621-m8-100

It's got an IP67 rated 60mm SS body with 53mm of threads and rated up to 140C.  While I'd feel better if the prob end was also enclosed in the SS housing, it's at least a liquid crystal polymer (LCP) - like Kevlar, so about a good as plastic as you can get - so  I think this still *should* be good enough to survive tucked into the cylinder head.  I mean, they bolt lesser-plastic intakes to cylinder heads all the time, right?

Anyway, when the sensor gets here I'll be able to bench test it in short order however I won't be able to actually run it in the car for a while.  The head in the car currently is an E21 with no fuel pump hole, and the good one on my bench is an E12 which is waiting on the rebuilt bottom end to go in the car, which in turn is waiting on new Ross pistons I ordered via Ireland 4 months ago so. . . no clue how much longer that's all gonna take unfortunately.

Oh, and as for sealing the mounting, I just took a piece of the thick (I think 1/8") cork gasket sheet I had laying around and cut out a small section of it to mount the wire.  I think with a little RTV there to help seal the seams it should actually work great, with no extra machining of the block-off plate necessary!

PXL_20240717_131932120.thumb.jpg.b54641a9def751d4649ed708fec2eade.jpg

 

So, all good news so far, but afraid it'll be a while yet before I can provide any 'trial-by-fire' results, sorry. . . 😕

Any updates on your sensor? Also how are you holding the sensor in place within the head? 

 

My rod/spring setup works ok, but I'd like to remove the mechanical bits.

 

Thanks!

Posted

Engine is back but still assembling it so I haven't gotten as far as putting the head on yet but I will be soon.  Keeping it in place in the head is going to be the challenge though; although the threads are *just barely* longer than the boss in the head, because of how the casting is not-at-all flat there still just isn't enough room to securely get a nut on the front and back.  So rather than risking having metal parts falling down inside my new engine, I'm honestly contemplating just 'sticking' it in there with black oil-safe RTV, as at least that won't do any damage other than to the sensor or an oil leak if it comes loose!

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...