Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Confusing info on tires abundant in the archives...


Guest Anonymous

Recommended Posts

Guest Anonymous

I looked at lots of pages reccomending 205/60/13 combination to be good and see other pages saying that 185 is the widest one can go. Assuming a 13x6 wheel, which one is correct? I know for sure I will go the tire rack route but need to clarify the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

the 205s might rub, might not -but it'll be close. 185-70-13 might rub up front (did for me).

I have IE stage II springs and 205s in back -had to be slightly rolled. If I corrected the rear camber they'd have to be rolled more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

205's rub ?? that was my doubt. I have 195's on my other car with 14" rims and they barely make it. so I am thinking maybe the 205's are for the rear and something like 185's in the front...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

There is a surprising variance from one car to another -- even from left to right on the same car. Depends on body tolerances during production and subsequent bodywork. Depends also on how square the tread shoulder is and how wide the tread is, both a function of tire model. Also depends on wheel width and -- important! -- wheel offset.

205/60-13 fits on some cars and not on others. This can't be predicted for a particular car -- only tested. If there is rub, it will probably be at the rear fender lips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

First, it depends on your wheel's offset. The offset can be a bit off, but if the tire is not too wide, it will not rub. In the case of the 205.60.13, your margin is pretty slim and you might make sure the wheel has the exact offset which should be around 25 to 30mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

have no problem. I have had no problem with the 195's in the rear. Assuming there would be no issue, can I have 185/70/13's in the front and 195/70/13 in the back without rolling the fenders ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

Later cars have a bit more clearence in back (The wheel arch lip is about half as wide as earlier cars).

I run 205/60R13s on my 72 2002 with 13x6 6-spoke cromodoras and I had to trim the rear wheel lip (which was about 3/4" wide -stock). One of the rear wheels rubbed. I also own a 72 tii, I suspect that those same wheels would fit on it without any problems because the lip width is only about 1/4" (stock).

-Jaycen

72 tundra tii

72 agave 2002

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

URL: http://www.tirerack.com/tires/SearchTires.jsp

If you are using stock wheels (remember the comments about offset), a 195-mm width in the rear is not a problem. Having different sizes or models front-to-back may upset the well-balanced handling (oversteer/understeer) of your 02. Why do you want different sizes? There is a small problem with the 195/70-13 size: it may not exist. Do a size search at the Tire Rack URL.

If you want 195s all around, this is a good time to switch to 14-inch wheels and use 195/60-14 tires. Better tires are available for 14-inch wheels than for 13-inch. Again, see URL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...