Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

'02 ball joint height


Guest Anonymous

Recommended Posts

Guest Anonymous

has anyone had a problem with clearance

between the control arm and the bottom of the strut

after installing the new type ball joints which now

only mount from the bottom of the control arm? i

have rebuilt the front end with all new parts and

now the car will not steer. part of the problem is

that the car is just a shell at this point and the front

suspension is completely unloaded putting the

control arms at a severe angle. i suppose that the

weight of the motor/trans ect. will change the

relationship of the control arm and steering arm

and there might be just enough clearance but it

doesn't seem correct that the wheels would not

steer if the car were on a lift i.e. unloaded as it is

now. my parts guy says that he has never had an

issue with these ball joints in 20 yrs. is there a

spacer or bushing inside the steering arm that i

don't know about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

"the new type ball joints which now only mount from the bottom of the control arm?"

Are you sure it mnounts from under the control arm? I believe that it is your problem. Try to bolt it from tghe top, it will solve your problem...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

after discovering the problem the first time i took

the entire assembly off the car back to the shop

that did the work thinking that the ball joints were

not installed correctly. however they will only fit from

the bottom and the parts house confirms that they

are only meant to go in from the bottom. it seems

amazing to me that this has not been a major

problem in the past. they sent two replacement ball

joints (my cost) but they are exactly the same. i

read somewhere on this board about someone

'drawing" the joints down from the top into position.

i tried this and it seemed wildly dangerous as the

mating surfaces do not touch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

Look at you old ball joints (assuming the're still laying around in the corner of the garage) and compare -just a rough casting on the new bits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

thanks for the info.

it is a bit strange that you would have to do that

though, don't you think? i have someone who is

going to bring this up to the moog people anyway.

seems like a lot to ask grinding on a new part just

to drop in a ball joint. it's an '02 not a freakin'

bugatti or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

this may or may not be news but i just discovered

that one of the four ball joint kits i now have in my

possession is machined and not cast. this one fits

like it should. no grindind required. i tried grindind

on one of the ball joints that are cast and i still don't

like the way it fits. the casting is beveled where it

meets the flange and will not seat all the way

down. all in all 3 of the 4 ball joints are diffrent even

though they have the same part no. stamped on

the bottom. i'm going to contact the parts place and

see if they can dig out another machined one. i

would suggest to anyone else to do the same. it

fits so much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

with. I went round and round with Bavarian with mine.

Sent me two different ones. Got a new front end sitting in boxes and the last thing I need is problems. Mine are TRW with TRW ground off with Moog

stamped over it.Go figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...