Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Tightening --- The Torque And Angle Method.


allbim

Recommended Posts

I don’t care what the manufacturers say. 

The torque and angle procedure for mounting a cylinder head is BS.

Picture this:  You are tightening the head-bolts, working your way from the center of the head out towards the ends.  The center bolts are tightened to their final position, but as you tighten the rest of the fasteners, the gasket gets squashed more and more.  By the time the outer bolts are properly torqued , the center bolts will be loose again.  How is this supposed to work?  I can see that the “torque and angle technique” might work when there are no gaskets involved that can collapse; such as bearing caps or other metal to metal applications, but not with squishy gaskets.  Am I missing something?  

 

Added on 10/28/13

The torque and angle method was devised to minimize bolt tension variations caused by variations of friction in the sliding surfaces, caused by differences in lubricants, the amount of lubrication and the type of materials sliding against each other.

Edited by allbim

No amount of skill or education will ever replace dumb luck
1971 2002 (much modified rocket),  1987 635CSI (beauty),  

2000 323i,  1996 Silverado Pickup (very useful)

Too many cars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can think the other way around. I think this is how it should be.

You torque first lightly, so that gasket is tight but not squished yet. Then turn each bolt same amount. Shouldn't that be pretty even then?

 

After writing that, I still like the old simple method more. In last assembly I tried the angle method first time and I think the bolts went way more tighter than with the old method. I'm interested to hear what the real specialists say.

 

  Tommy

Edited by Tommy

Racing is Life - everything before and after is just waiting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's some info I received from Tom Jones, who's been working on '02s in the shop where he works for many years.  First is my questions to him:

 

"My question regards weather I can use the the old head bolt torque values upon reinstalling a new gasket (and I'm using new head bolts this time). I'd use an initial torque of 25-33#/ft., wait 15 min., torque to 43-47#/ft., run the engine 25 min, then a final torque of 49-52#/ft. (though I've heard thah 55#/ft is good for the final torque)."

 

And here's his reply:

 

"Yes you can use the old torque specs... . I've successfully used both old and new specs. And a reminder to readjust the valves after whatever last torque. I used to ramp up to a final of 60lbft. Make sure there's a light coating of oil on the bolt threads and holes. I usually only blow out the holes with compressed air and a couple drops on the bolt threads."

 

Current head gasket has been in for about a year with no problems whatsoever.

 

Bob Napier


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say the angle torque method is BS as well.  I did all the recommended things and followed the procedures on my new engine, cleaned out threads well, new bolts with oil on them, etc.  Within 300 miles, compression started leaking from cylinder to cylinder, and then it blew a big hole in the head gasket.  Not gonna do that again.

 

Not to mention, with the angle torque method, there's no way to easily re-torque the head bolts after the engine has been run a little.  You can't just snug them up, you'd have to loosen them all the way and go through all the steps again.   

Bring a Welder

1974 2002, 1965 Datsun L320 truck, 1981 Yamaha XS400, 1983 Yamaha RX50, 1992 Miata Miata drivetrain waiting on a Locost frame, 1999 Toyota Land Cruiser

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As KFunk hints, you could of course go through the tightening procedure more than once, loosening one bolt at a time and then re-tightening it, using the torque/angle method. This obviously cannot be done with stretch-bolts, but M10 head-bolts are not stretch-bolts.

Edited by allbim

No amount of skill or education will ever replace dumb luck
1971 2002 (much modified rocket),  1987 635CSI (beauty),  

2000 323i,  1996 Silverado Pickup (very useful)

Too many cars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I've successfully used both old and new specs.

 

Me too.  Having gone through a bunch of head gaskets in a short time (because racecar) you start to figure out that both methods

are supposed to crush the head gasket to a certain thickness, and thus, compression pressure.

 

With the angle method, if you go too far, there is a 'torque step' that you feel (it can be measured- it's about 80 ft/lbs) when you

get to a certain point.  That's where the head gasket 'bottoms' on the hard surfaces in it (inside the fire rings at the cylinders).

When you hit it, it feels like the bolt has stopped- yes, maybe you could go further, but the 'mechanic's sense' says that you'll probably

bend or strip something.

 

I think the idea with both methods is to get you CLOSE TO, but not ONTO, those hard surfaces.  Leaving just a little bit of 'give' in the

head gasket flexible materials, but not much at all.

 

What I found.

 

t

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allbim,

 

You second comment is correct. Torque plus angle is used because otherwise with torque only the friction of the head bolt threads against the block threads gets mixed into the torque reading (yes even when oil is applied). Since the goal is a uniform clamp load torque + angle is a better approach.

 

To get around compressing gaskets reducing the torque load (at least one) manufacture recommends doing the torque + angle in 3 passes. So you would turn each head bolt 3 separate times. A more precise name for the procedure might be torque + angle + angle.

76 '02 owned 20 years.....project for the last 13. I should probably be faster than the rust I'm chasing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Ha.  I have often wondered that.  Except that it says to heat the motor, then add angle.  So you  twist while hot.

If you were supposed to  rotate cold, it would have an extra 'go down twelve steins, and then sleep it off' step.

 

The difference between German and 'other' thinking.

 

Honestly, I expect it doesn't matter too much, except that you get a 'hot torque', and if you do that with the

'traditional' method, you almost always end up adding 45- 90 degrees on each bolt.

 

Clear as mud?

 

t

 

edit- oh, yeah, as Buckeye says, it's between step 4 and 6 that you warm it up.

 

1- initial torque (30 ft- lbs from memory, but that's got holes in it.  Too many cars.  Too many GinandTonix)

2- add some angle

3- wait

4 add more angle

5 add heat

6 add even more angle.

7 profit

Edited by TobyB

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bump an old thread.

 

The heat cycle between the first and second angle. Do you let the motor cool after the heat cycle before retightening or do you tighten a hot motor?

There is only one warm cycle. Not two. First time torque to 60 Nm, then wait 15 minutes and torque angle to 33deg. Next step warm up the car to normal temp. Torque angle to 25 deg.

post-43112-0-05312600-1399690576_thumb.j

76 2002 Sienabraun

2015 BMW f10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never built anything up that called for torque angle, but I also don't work in aerospace.

 

My take would be that if a straight torque reading is good enough to keep the S38 in my M6 (or an M88 in an M1) together, then straight torque is good enough for me.

 

 

Jose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...