Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Nose Down Stance


Stuart

Recommended Posts

I'm researching stance options for my 72.  I've been through the "stance" thread which has been very helpful.  My debate as I decide on ride height is level vs "nose down".  In looking through the stance thread I see several cars that sit with the front being slightly lower creating what I call a nose down stance.  I am leaning towards this over level and I'm wondering how this was achieved? 

 

Was it done through tire and wheel size difference, spring length, spacers or something else? 

 

Or am I just in need of new glasses?

 

Spike       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the cars do have different tires sizes/ profiles to make it look like that.  You MUST read carefully through the "stance" thread and all the hidden answers are there (yes it takes a lot of time to go through 30 pages)  Obviously you will never find the exact combo you want though :D   But I think 02s look better flat.  Seems to be more Euro to me. Muscle cars go ass- up ;)

Beast 02- '74 2002
Beast 35- '11 135i
The Twins!!!
O=00=O

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spike,

 

I have the slight nose down.  Mine was accidental.  I have the IE Stage 1 springs, Billie (HDs I think), 15x7 with 205s.  It would be even more nose lower but I put my spacers between struts and inside fender wheel. The tires would rub with a RR crossing or speed bump.

 

The primary reason mine is nose down is because of the springs. Nothing else.

 

Hope this helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nose down here also. Hd shocks, ie stage 1 springs, front aluminum spacers removed. Two dot rear upper spring seats. Was almost 1.5 inches lower up front which was unacceptable for handeling concerns.

In the end i put ie fixed camber plates and a 1/4 inch spacer up front, and cut the rubber spring seats in the back for a far more acceptable 1 inch rake (advised in the tii registry suspension article). I would be happy to drop the rear an extra 1/4 to 1/2, but without a measuring tape, you would not notice.

Great setup for improved looks, and with the ie adjustable sway bars... A beast on the track without sacraficing streetability. Zero rubbing with 195/60/14 falken 615k's on e30 bottlecaps with hard cornering on the track. Brillient tire suspension combo for street/track.

1973 2002Tii (Pacific Blue)

1984 911 3.2 Carrera (Platnum Metallic)

2009 328xi (Black Sapphire Metallic)

2010 Mazda Speed3 (Black Metallic)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nose down here also. Hd shocks, ie stage 1 springs, front aluminum spacers removed. Two dot rear upper spring seats. Was almost 1.5 inches lower up front which was unacceptable for handeling concerns.

In the end i put ie fixed camber plates and a 1/4 inch spacer up front, and cut the rubber spring seats in the back for a far more acceptable 1 inch rake (advised in the tii registry suspension article). I would be happy to drop the rear an extra 1/4 to 1/2, but without a measuring tape, you would not notice.

Great setup for improved looks, and with the ie adjustable sway bars... A beast on the track without sacraficing streetability. Zero rubbing with 195/60/14 falken 615k's on e30 bottlecaps with hard cornering on the track. Brillient tire suspension combo for street/track.

1 dot rear, IE sways.  Agreed on the additional drop in the rear of 1/4 to 1/2.  Would you consider cutting the springs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'Rake', as it's called, has a substantial effect on a 2002's handling-  when you look at roll centers in the rear suspension,

you find that as little as 1/2" in rake change can make a substantial difference in over/understeer characteristics.

 

t

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-39527-0-44840600-1378439354_thumb.jthis is with IE stage 1 no spacers in front and 15x6 wheels with 195/50s. Pretty flat look and handles great. Offset is perfect on the wheels

Mike Katsoris CCA#13294                                                

74 InkaGangster 4281862

2016 Porsche Boxster Spyder,    2004 BMW R1150RT,  
76 Estorilblau 2740318                      

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use to run around with HnR's up front and stocks in the rear and sways all around. Man did the back of that thing roll all over the place... Keep em flat! They drive better  :lol:

 

2002+stance.jpg

Edited by roadhog0

-Nathan
'76 2002 in Malaga (110k Original, 2nd Owner, sat for 20 years and now a toy)
'86 Chevy K20 (6.2 Turbo Diesel build) & '46 Chevy 2 Ton Dump Truck
'74 Suzuki TS185, '68 BSA A65 Lightning (garage find), '74 BMW R90S US Spec #2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

depends on what height you want. if very low, then i'd be more keen to keep wheel gap/tuck even front-to-rear, than rocker height even front-to-rear. if you only want a mild drop like most do, maybe level rockers and smaller rear wheel gap will work for you.

there's cars out there that are far worse for 'rake' than 2002's, old Cressida's come to mind, and lets not forget E30's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what you need to do, IMNSHO, is to discard the "what it looks like" mentality and get yourself an understanding of the mechanics and physics that come into play in suspension engineering. 

 

Some questions to entertain...

 

Will you be a poser with a car that looks bitchen, or will you honestly fine tune your car so that it is capable of performing better than it did when it left the factory? "Stance" per se is largely and solidly within the poser realm.

 

Can you drive the car safely anywhere near the limits of stock performance?

 

Where is your roll center and what effect does it have?  What do changes to caster, camber, and toe-in do?  Should your control arms drop from the subframe out to the ball joints, be level, or tilt up?

 

There is some expertise on this board, but with few exceptions most of what I've read is about appearance and "handling" whatever that is, being an occasional benefit.

 

It's often said that the driver his/herself is the weak link in performance... word!

 

And oh yeah, speed costs money, how much have you got?

 

Flame suit on.

Edited by Honolulu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, you can always stiffen the springs to compensate for whatever effect rake might happen to have.

 

Sure, your ultimate grip might go down, but if it's stable in a drift, what else really matters?  The legal

speed limit is always half of what it should be to be any fun anyways, right?

 

Then again, i buy cheap stock car springs, cut them in half, put them into a spring rate checker,

and start cutting off parts of coils until I get the rates I want. 

 

Don't most people?

 

t

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...