Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.


Go to solution Solved by mikeshotrodshop,

Recommended Posts

I have been building engines for about 30 years or so but can't seem to get a straight answer on factory e10 crankshaft strength. I am building a "budget" performer and need to know the crank material ( I.e. 4340 chromoly , 5140 chromoly, ) in order to calculate max stress and RPM that it can tolerate. Also, are any high volume oil pumps available for this engine series? Any insight would be very helpfull.

Of all the cars I have ever purchased, this is certainly one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive never heard of an M10 crank breaking, std oil pump can push bloody heaps of oil ...120 psi.

Weak part of the M10 engine is the rockers, continuous RPM over 7500, they will probably break.

72/2002 Inca

72tii/2002 "Apple"

70/2002 "Five "

73/2002 "Freeda"

2007 Lotus 7 Replica

2011 Ford xr6 Ute

85 E30 325

70 1600-2 "Orange"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you get near 700 hp, maybe think about oil pump improvements?

 

This guy swapped an m30 rotor into the stock 02 pump, for a bit of an improvement, and he has 740rwhp.

http://www.bmw2002faq.com/topic/119432-m10-dyno-world-record/

 

I can't find where he made any improvements to the stock crank.

 

Sorry that this isn't commonly known information, because these parts don't break.  With a 'budget' build you'll get nowhere near their limits.  Worry about rockers and other valvetrain parts instead (IE HD rockers are working well for me). 

Bring a Welder

1974 2002, 1965 Datsun L320 truck, 1981 Yamaha XS400, 1983 Yamaha RX50, 1992 Miata Miata drivetrain waiting on a Locost frame, 1999 Toyota Land Cruiser

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A completely stock crank can put up with a hell of a lot of abuse. You'll likely destroy main bearings long before the crank lets go. A balanced stock crank is likely good up to 10,000 rpm of continued use. As said before, the bottom end is not what you have to worry about, it's the top end. 

1974 Grey European Market BMW 2002 

1976 Yellow BMW 2002 "GOLDENROD" SOLD

1972 Yellow Austin Mini 1000

A bunch of Bikes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been building engines for about 30 years or so but can't seem to get a straight answer on factory e10 crankshaft strength. I am building a "budget" performer and need to know the crank material ( I.e. 4340 chromoly , 5140 chromoly, ) in order to calculate max stress and RPM that it can tolerate.

I like math and calculations... but have never done it for the M10 crankshaft.

 

My own empirical data: I lightened an M10 crankshaft by six pounds, have run it in a full race engine with nearly 160HP at the wheels for 80+ hours without issue. (Is there a calculation to translate race hours to street hours?)

 

Also: Suggest checking M10 crankshafts for straightness. -KB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent! All of this info is greatly appreciated. I will be using this for some competition use and running around 8000 peak for 30 minute stretches , and I know most factory cranks will not tolerate that. (American engines come to mind) . I figured they must be pretty good since a google for crank failure didnt reveal much. I already have h-beam rods, forged slugs that are slightly tall so I can machine them for the head once I determine the set up for that. I will focus on the head as you all suggest. Once we start the machine work I will take some pics and post it. At this point we were shooting for a cost of $1000 without machining cost (it's free if I do it) but it looks like it is going to be around $1500 for the build of the long block. Thanks again for all the help!

Of all the cars I have ever purchased, this is certainly one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you are a serious machinist and can make your own rocker arms, a budget of $1500 is going to hamper your desire to turn 8000 rpm for 30 min.  You talk about how many RPM you want to run but nothing of the HP and Torque you expect to make.  You can turn a stock M10 to 8000 rpm (not for very long) on a stock cam and 1 bbl carb but it will not be making any power up there.  There are other considerations you need to look at.  Is this going to be just a track car or also a street car?  Things you can do on a race engine that does not spend a lot of time at any single rpm can cause problems when you get out of the freeway and cruise for an hour at say 4000 rpm.  There might just be at a secondary harmonic and cause a problem at some point in the rpm range.  (lightweight cranks are not a great idea on street cars).     

1970 1602 (purchased 12/1974)

1974 2002 Turbo

1988 M5

1986 Euro 325iC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After re-reading, I think he meant that it'd be run hard for 30 minutes at a time, which includes often being at a peak of 8000rpm.  At least I hope.  I don't know what racing series would ever require you to stay at 8000 rpm for 30 minutes straight.  That does not sound comfortable.

Bring a Welder

1974 2002, 1965 Datsun L320 truck, 1981 Yamaha XS400, 1983 Yamaha RX50, 1992 Miata Miata drivetrain waiting on a Locost frame, 1999 Toyota Land Cruiser

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was making that assumption also, but once again RPM does not let us know how much power he is planning on making.  A lot of people spin their engines a lot harder than the HP or Torque output needs them too.  I know exactly what it takes to make max HP@8000 rpm with a M10 and doing it on a $1500 budget is not going to be easy. 

 

First rule of racing "HP cost $$$, How fast do you want to spend?"

1970 1602 (purchased 12/1974)

1974 2002 Turbo

1988 M5

1986 Euro 325iC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After re-reading, I think he meant that it'd be run hard for 30 minutes at a time, which includes often being at a peak of 8000rpm.  At least I hope.  I don't know what racing series would ever require you to stay at 8000 rpm for 30 minutes straight.  That does not sound comfortable.

Correct! It will need to turn hard periodically but not continuously. I will run between 5500 and 7500 on a road circuit and naturally aspirated is a requirement. I already have most of the parts on hand and at this point I have about $800 in it. A one barrel carb? Not quite, it is well breathed and well camed. I hoping for 200 hp. Should be easy enough.

Of all the cars I have ever purchased, this is certainly one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...