Jump to content

Bodyshell disassembly - when is bracing needed?


Taymar

Recommended Posts

I have a rolling shell; subframes, steering, and suspension are still in it but that's about it.

Soon I will need to remove the doors and the nose panel. I believe if you're replacing the sills/rockers or a quarter panel, it's good practice to brace the shell with temporary diagonal bars to avoid distortion.

I'd guess the doors are safe to remove (?) but should I brace the strut towers or frame rails before removing the nose panel? Should I have the new nose panel fitted before I add the weight of the engine?

Thanks for any tips, I'm not having a lot of luck finding answers online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a temporary brace when I replaced the nose but I've seen many projects done without. Doors can be removed off course and I wouldn't be too worried about engine weight either. Subframe supports the engine and braces the body nicely.

Tommy

t_p4100003_120.jpg

Racing is Life - everything before and after is just waiting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're planning to use braces (a good idea), I'd do it before removing sub-frames and nose.

I'll be replacing both subframes with new/reconditioned ones. Does this make any difference in the order of bracing/removal, and should I still brace the cabin for removing the nose/subframes?

thanks for the help guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On one hand, if the body flexes after removing subframes, you've got more serious issues on your hands in terms of structural integrity. In theory, removing the subframes should make no difference to a sound body shell. On the other hand, if you're going to put in braces, why not do it while the maximum rigidity is in the structure? Things only get dicey when you start removing rocker panels, pieces of floor, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's possible, the car's had accident damage which has been repaired before.

I'm hoping the subframes & their mounting points will still be accurate; if they're tweaked and the replacement subframes don't line up nicely that could get interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its unlikely the shell will turn into a pretzel the second you remove front cross-member. It has two guide pins - I'd unbolt it and then see if it will go back on cleanly. Rear unlikely to be problem - pretty strong back there - assuming accident didn't affect area. Blue Shop Manual has measurements for shell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that's sometimes overlooked-

support the shell evenly and appropriately.

For the nose, it shouldn't matter much, but even so,

make sure the weight's evenly distributed on whatever you

use to support it.

t

"I learn best through painful, expensive experience, so I feel like I've gotten my money's worth." MattL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I changed the front clip and boot floor and rear panel I had the car on a jig and then I braced everything before chopping bits off the car.

I needed the jig because the car was bent, but if yours is straight then cross bracing should be all you need. It only takes 5 minutes to weld bracing in and quite frankly I think it's madness to even attempt replacing large structural portions of the body without bracing.

post-611-13667669079401_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. I wish I could find somewhere with a proper jig, so far I've turned up nothing within a reasonable distance.

I think I've got some good ideas for the nose panel brace now, thanks.

If I'm bracing the interior, any suggestions on where I should run the braces to and from? Cross brace the shell or A pillars to B pillar floor etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

×
×
  • Create New...