Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

2002 speedometer / differential combinations


schuetz1619

Recommended Posts

(1) My tii has a 320i 5-speed overdrive transmission and a 320i LSD diff. I understand that the 320i diff came in both 3.64:1 and 3.91:1 gearing. How can I tell which I have (preferably without having to pull it)?

(2) 2002 speedometers come with a calibration reference number on the back. Does anyone know what calibration number is intended for use with which differential gear ratio?

(3) I just had my speedometer calibrated by Speedometer Service in Portland according to the calibration number stamped onto the back of the unit. As measured with a GPS unit, it is accurate at 35 mph, but as you go faster, it reads increasingly incorrectly, on the high side. For example, at 65 mph it reads 70. Also, the odometer reads 6% too high. Is this what would happen if the diff / speedometer combination were wrong?

Gordon Paine

Eugene, Oregon

1971 Euro 2002tii 27000056

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is reading correct at 35, then you have the right speedo for your diff. The error at higher speeds is just a limitation of the speedo (perhaps older weaker springs, etc).

The error I had with the wrong speedo for the diff was in the order of 30% IIRC (a 3.9 diff on a 74Tii). I bought a new speedo of the correct calibration and it works perfectly now.

B

Link to comment
Share on other sites

List (below) taken from a post earlier this year.

3.45:1 diff -- W=1.24 speedo

3.64:1 diff -- W=1.297 speedo (W=1.30 is close enough)

3.90:1 diff -- W=1.39 speedo ('76 49-State 2002)

3.91:1 diff -- W=1.393 speedo (E21 320is LSD)

4.10:1 diff -- W=1.4 speedo (1.461 calculated)

4.11:1 diff -- W=1.4 speedo (1.465 calculated)

4.38:1 diff -- W=1.559 speedo (calculated)

HTH

Les

'74 '02 - Jade Touring (RHD)

'76 '02 - Delk's "Da Beater"

FAQ Member #17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume that GPS-calculated speed is fairly accurate. I have no particular reason for assuming that other than (1.) the consistency I've witnessed among 4 different GPS units; and (2.) some vague confidence in technology I don't understand. Is it reasonable to compare our speedometers to our GPS units and assume the GPS speed is more accurate?

Steve

1976 2002 Polaris, 2742541 (original owner)

1973 2002tii Inka, 2762757 (not-the-original owner)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another veriable in the equation is your wheel/tire size. The original tire diameter on your car was approx. 23.4 in. If you're running something different that will also enter into the equation.

I'm going with Bob on this one. At the relatively low speed of 35MPH the variation would be less visible until you increase speed and the error is exaggerated.

Remember the speedometer simply measures the number of rotations of the transmission output shaft. The rest is a matter of ratios ending in the ratio between one revolution of the tranny output shaft and the rotation of the rear tire. If you don't have the correct tire size for the ratios that the "system" is designed for then you have error that is increased as the speed increases.

One turn of the driveline typically translates to 23.4" of forward travel. If you have a different tire size the ratio changes so one turn of the driveline equals something else.

Todd

"Common sense isn't common"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...