Jump to content
  • When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Engine bottom end assembly questions.


Guest Anonymous

Recommended Posts

Guest Anonymous

Well I finally got my bottom end together. I used a dab of assembly lube and torqued everything to spec. It was very difficult to rotate the engine by hand before torquing the main caps, but now with them torques it's almost impossible. Is this right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

Should turn easily with no binding. Are you sure you have the right cap in the correct location and orientation for each bearing. They are not interchangable in location or rotation. Is the thrust bearing in the correct location? Did you check clearances with plastigage? Good luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

Is it possible that I put too much assembly lube in? I plastigauged it quite a bit to make sure I was withing tolerances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

Make sure the main caps and rod caps are in the right orientation otherwise they tend to cock to one side and bind up the crank.

Even though theoretically this should make no difference, when I was mocking up my friends engine it made a noticable difference when I mucked up the rod cap orientation.

Take it apart again and check each bearing for signs of rubbing. Then take everything apart and reassemble one part at a time...ie conn rod #1 then #2 to the crank etc to check fits. Do the same with the crank to block but only do one main cap at a time. Make sure everything moves easily when torqued up.

If you don't get it to spin freely it means somewhere there is interfereence which will undoubatably be bad for engine life, if you can even get it to turn over and start in the first place.

-Bernard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

I've posted before about the often overlooked requirement to also reduce the width of the #3 main journal thrust surfaces when grinding a crank.

The main bearings sets for undersize journals all come with thicker thrust bearing area, if your shop did the crank journal diameters only, you will not have the required clearance on the thrust face, and the result is a binding condition due to insufficient endplay.

The thrust width specs for reqrinds are in the manual.

Yes, the crank should spin easily if the main bores are in alignment & everything is OK. Do not continue if there is any binding, it's not going to "wear in" without serious damage risk.

Always check crank endplay during assembly, specs are in the book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

Well I'm hoping when you took the main caps off that you marked which one was what and direction. If you didn't there are only no less than 15 possible combinations that they could be. remember to align the tangs correctly.. IMHO.. plastigauge sux... pull off your main caps and look for the shiney spot.. make sure there is zero dirt in the tang grooves or behind the bearings.. next time when you assemble... zip all the main caps down with a air gun to "light tight".. then torque each one... from center out.. and after each main cap try and spin the crank... then you'll know if the last one fucked up.. ;) Party On

Kris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    BMW Neue Klasse - a birth of a Sports Sedan

    Unveiling of the Neue Klasse Unveiled in 1961, BMW 1500 sedan was a revolutionary concept at the outset of the '60s. No tail fins or chrome fountains. Instead, what you got was understated and elegant, in a modern sense, exciting to drive as nearly any sports car, and yet still comfortable for four.   The elegant little sedan was an instant sensation. In the 1500, BMW not only found the long-term solution to its dire business straits but, more importantly, created an entirely new
    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    History of the BMW 2002 and the 02 Series

    In 1966, BMW was practically unknown in the US unless you were a touring motorcycle enthusiast or had seen an Isetta given away on a quiz show.  BMW’s sales in the US that year were just 1253 cars.  Then BMW 1600-2 came to America’s shores, tripling US sales to 4564 the following year, boosted by favorable articles in the Buff Books. Car and Driver called it “the best $2500 sedan anywhere.”  Road & Track’s road test was equally enthusiastic.  Then, BMW took a cue from American manufacturers,
    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    The BMW 2002 Production Run

    BMW 02 series are like the original Volkswagen Beetles in one way (besides both being German classic cars)—throughout their long production, they all essentially look alike—at least to the uninitiated:  small, boxy, rear-wheel drive, two-door sedan.  Aficionados know better.   Not only were there three other body styles—none, unfortunately, exported to the US—but there were some significant visual and mechanical changes over their eleven-year production run.   I’ve extracted t
  • Upcoming Events

  • Supporting Vendors

×
×
  • Create New...