I watched a BBC documentary yesterday called The Third Tower about the collapse of the WTC building no. 7. The central question was how that tower could collapse the way it did, while there never was an aeroplane that flew into it. Was it simply because of the fire? And if so, could a fire let a building collapse in the same manner if like demolition charges were set?
They interviewed parties from both camps, including that kid who made Loose Change - an internet movie that shares it's level of proof (or better, lack thereof), patheticness, and yawn-factor with BIG fat Al's An Inconvenient Truth. Questions are asked, answer mostly given, for example about the possibility of the collapse. Overall a pretty good documentary, although I must admit there are some issues unadressed, like why is there still no conclusive official report on that building?
Now I myself am not much of a conspiracy theory buyer in general, because let's be honest, people are just not that good in keeping a secret... and for a conspiracy this big you need a lot of people. However, the documentary suggests that the events of 9/11 are still up for much debate and theories in the US, and many people aren't buying the official stories and reports. Every citizen of every country has every reason the question their government, so I'm curious about your questions.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/conspiracyfiles
_________________
Keep on rolling in the free world!