| |
|
Date: 7-7-08 02:10
From: oz_tom in Melbourne - Australia
Subject: Re: $11000 2002? 53 miles on it?
|

|
| Beaner7102 wrote: | Yeah only 53 miles, after clocking over for the 4th time or since the odo died 15 years ago. I dont believe odo readings in these cars. Too easy to open them up for repair or winding back.
Beaner7102 |
QFT _________________
72tii - Whitey
74 - Blacky
|
Date: 7-7-08 05:13
From: oldguy
Subject: Re: $11000 2002? 53 miles on it?
|
|
|
I can make anyones car say 53k on it in about 20 minutes with a flat tip screwdriver.. the screws to get out the gauge pannel are thumb screws... don't believe mileage... see what your eyes tell you..
|
Date: 7-7-08 07:10
From: Albany02
Subject: Re: $11000 2002? 53 miles on it?
|
|
|
Forget about the miles. Is the car really super clean, generally "rust free" mechanically solid and straight? If so, it might be worth $11K; having spent much more on mine to get it decent. I'd offer $8100 and see what happens.
Roger
'72 Malaga
|
Date: 7-7-08 07:39
From: BLUNT in Wayzata,Minnesota, gods country
Subject: Re: $11000 2002? 53 miles on it?
|

|
| Albany02 wrote: | Forget about the miles. Is the car really super clean, generally "rust free" mechanically solid and straight? If so, it might be worth $11K; having spent much more on mine to get it decent. I'd offer $8100 and see what happens.
Roger
'72 Malaga |
true, mileage means nothing on these cars unless someone is being deceitful and trying to pass a car off as original miles. my M2 has 680k on it but whats really left of the original car? _________________ 
lowest pricing on new OE bmw parts
email me unkorama@gmail.com
VISA/MC
|
Date: 7-7-08 01:38
From: bmdubracing in Chardon Ohio
Subject: Re: $11000 2002? 53 miles on it?
|

|
| 70roundtail02 wrote: | | what's with the seats, does the lower half of the passenger side appear to be two tone yellow and black? OR is it just the light? |
No I do believe that the bottom of that seat is some kind of black and tan. You can see it in the pic of the dash to. _________________ "There is another way, do a nice burn out and look on your rear view mirror, two tire marks= lsd, one tire mark= a tire lsd of open. But I don't think the seller would appreciate this approach"
|
Date: 7-7-08 02:29
From: Pinepig in Citrus Heights, CA
Subject: Re: $11000 2002? 53 miles on it?
|

|
It's a 76 so in California it's not worth a squirt of piss. ( you would have to smog it ) _________________ Charlie Mac in Sacramento.
My Blog
I'm an كافر
|
Date: 7-8-08 04:43
From: Mike_R
Subject: Re: $11000 2002? 53 miles on it?
|
|
| Lee wrote: | | Mike_R wrote: | | WTF it clearly said 53,000 miles. |
at 99,999 miles, the odometer goes back to... 0 mile. Which means that 54K miles can be 154K, 254K, 354k... It takes a full history of the vehicule since the very early days to prove real low mileage. |
Oh I know Lee, I was just trying to point out that nowhere in the ad did it even hint that there was a claim of only 53 miles on the car. 53K, 153k, or 253k whatever, if the car sell for $11,000 why would anyone have an issue with either the buyer or seller!?!?
I for one would be happy to see the market go through the roof. I don't intend to sell, but it is nice to know some investment could be recouped. _________________ 75 2002
|
|
|
|