f1reverb wrote:

to how it will be viewed in the future. If the same-sex divorce rate (and there will be divorces) is substantially lower than for the traditional oppsex marriages it won't look good for tradition, will it? I believe this trend will also prove to allow sibling/cousin marriages in the future. How can you deny a bro/bro sis/sis bro/sis marriage (especially the former two) as their won't be any natural children to throw the birth-defect fodder against the bro/bro sis/sis unions. There's gonna be some fun times with contract law coming. Freedom of choice is the issue and generally those of a conservative bent are for individual freedom and choice -- except for this issue and a whole pile of others. On the other hand, the left doesn't want the people to have the choice of being armed, among their many no-choice flaws. You can't have it a one-way street whether right or left.

I believe the divorce rate will be the same, my sister in law just went through some nasty divorce, and hearing talking about it, you wouldn't know it was with another girl - by the way these two had to be the most beautiful couple, but I digress, the point is that there is more in common than we really realize. A man and a man, a woman and woman, really how much time you spend doing the sex thing vs just sharing your life with the other person. If you really think about it, marriage is a hell of a lot more than just sex - silly me, that is what I thought when I was a teenager, but I digress again,...

Agree F1 freedom is what it means freedom, I don't like guns, and I am opposed to handguns, but I will respect the freedom of getting one, if you so desire. I am pretty much a liberal, but I like nukes and I know an idiot when I hear one, regardless of party ines.
_________________
72 tii A4

Don't argue with anyone that will not consider the possibility of being wrong...
the future is a dream, the present infinitesimally brief, but the memories are forever...