gwb72tii wrote:

This should not be happening McCain is Bush-lite O man should have a big lead http://www.newsweek.com/id/145737

A three point lead is a dead heat? Must be that fuzzy math thing again.

And look at the electoral college maps. The Republican-leaning site (http://www.electionprojection.com/index.shtml) has the O-man up 306 to 232. That is a big lead in my book.

BTW, here's another electoral college site for ya: http://www.electoral-vote.com/. That one has it 320 to 204, with two ties.
_________________
“...democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.”

-Winston Churchill

[the faqer formerly known as schnell540]

Delia wrote:

Kinda early to be predicting the outcome of the Presidential race, don't ya think Georgie??? The polls that really count don't open till November. Delia

sweetie, re-read the post. i don't see any predictions, do you?

3% is a statistical dead heat. I find it amusing that with the entire main stream media behind O man, and how everyone hates bush (according to the same news sources), he's tied statistically with what the left is portraying as bush's potential 3rd term.

maybe your side has it wrong?

maybe the public is catching on to O man's real political record, and is beginning to see thing that aren't exactly center oriented policies.

Tax-to-the-max Obama
_________________
gwb72tii

Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
Mark Twain [Samuel Langhornne Clemens] (1835-1910)

gwb72tii wrote:

... I find it amusing that with the entire main stream media behind O man...

This is not really aimed at you, per se, timex*, but I find this all very amusing with the rightw-ing arguing as you do above and the liberal blogs that I read whining about the NBC, ABC, CNN, etc., love affair with McCain (and lack of unbaised reporting).

With both sides complaining so much, could it be that the press is actually somewhat neutral? Nah, of course.


* - I don't recall you complaining when the media fell for Bush's pre-war steamroller of lies.
_________________
“...democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.”

-Winston Churchill

[the faqer formerly known as schnell540]

inkatouring wrote:

gwb72tii wrote: ... I find it amusing that with the entire main stream media behind O man... This is not really aimed at you, per se, timex*, but I find this all very amusing with the rightw-ing arguing as you do above and the liberal blogs that I read whining about the NBC, ABC, CNN, etc., love affair with McCain (and lack of unbaised reporting). With both sides complaining so much, could it be that the press is actually somewhat neutral? Nah, of course. * - I don't recall you complaining when the media fell for Bush's pre-war steamroller of lies.

schnell man, i concede on your point about bias

however, i will refrain from the "lies" comment as it has been hashed to death. i would hate to be you in court trying to prove the lies part however. good way to starve.
_________________
gwb72tii

Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
Mark Twain [Samuel Langhornne Clemens] (1835-1910)

gwb72tii wrote:

schnell man, i concede on your point about bias however, i will refrain from the "lies" comment as it has been hashed to death. i would hate to be you in court trying to prove the lies part however. good way to starve.

Woo Hoo! I win. I win.

Actually, on the subject of winning, if the burden of proof was preponderance of the evidence (50.1%), I would be confident about being able to prove the lies thing. Beyond a reasonable doubt, maybe not. But, we both know I put it in there to tweak you and prove a point at the same time......
_________________
“...democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.”

-Winston Churchill

[the faqer formerly known as schnell540]

for a tort feasor, you're pretty funny!
_________________
gwb72tii

Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
Mark Twain [Samuel Langhornne Clemens] (1835-1910)

May I suggest that from here on out we call the two candidates with proper titles

Obamasiah and McLame.
_________________
Charlie Mac in Sacramento.
My Blog

I'm an كافر

what does this poll tell us?


a majority of the people of america are fucking retarded





_________________


1969 2002 Automatic w/ Sunroof "pumpkin"
1974 2002tii #2782677 (being assembled)

ryanOC wrote:

what does this poll tell us? a majority of the people of america are fucking retarded

funny, i would read it exactly the opposite!

it's because the USA does the heavy lifting after europe and the world can't reach a decision to do anything. (bosnia, iraq #1 & 2, WWII, etc.)
_________________
gwb72tii

Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
Mark Twain [Samuel Langhornne Clemens] (1835-1910)


Last edited by gwb72tii on 7-14-08 09:32; edited 1 time in total

gwb72tii wrote:

This should not be happening McCain is Bush-lite O man should have a big lead http://www.newsweek.com/id/145737

Obama still leads by 15 points according to LA Times/Bloomberg Poll covering a similar timeframe.

Newsweek's "facts" must be different.

"There are lies, damned lies, and then there's statistics." -Mark Twain

Delia
_________________
1973 2002tii - gone
Inka (aka "Orange Julius")
VIN 2762756

1974 2002tii - gone
Polaris (aka "Mae West")
VIN 2782824

BMW CCA member #1974

www.oldschoolbmw.com

deliawolfe@gmail.com

ryanOC wrote:

what does this poll tell us? a majority of the people of america are fucking retarded

anything but a damning to their people for having elected (cough-cough) what they have at home.

If I want the opinion of idiots no need to stray from our shores.

ryanOC wrote:

what does this poll tell us? a majority of the people of america are fucking retarded

i, for one, concede your point that a majority of people in america are retarded. however, this list is missing some constituencies-

which candidate do you think hezbollah, hamas and al qaeda support?

2761377 wrote:

which candidate do you think hezbollah, hamas and al qaeda support?

That's a trick question. They don't believe in democracy.
_________________
Keep on rolling in the free world!

2761377 wrote:

which candidate do you think hezbollah, hamas and al qaeda support?

Well, GWB has done the best by them. Ronald Reagan is in second place.
_________________
“...democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.”

-Winston Churchill

[the faqer formerly known as schnell540]

which candidate do you think hezbollah, hamas and al qaeda support?

all of them! where do u think these groups came from??
hahahaha!
_________________

Schweineback wrote:

2761377 wrote: which candidate do you think hezbollah, hamas and al qaeda support? That's a trick question. They don't believe in democracy.

Well, GWB has done the best by them. Ronald Reagan is in second place.


all of them! where do u think these groups came from??
hahahaha!


LOL- these are all pathetic attempts at mis-direction. i thought for sure some faq'r could come up with an inventive way to discredit this question.

come on, boys- give her your BEST shot!