Username

Password

Remember me
Forgotten your password??
No account yet? Create one
Home

Post new topic    BMW 2002 FAQ Forum Index > General Discussion
Jump to:  
Thread Topic: 1600 and 2002 differences Threaded

   
Date: 12-12-05 03:04
From: FL02 in Central FL View user's profile Send e-mail
Subject: 1600 and 2002 differences

Do they have different suspension, or is it the same?
-I think they have different control arms.
Are the shocks interchangalbe?
Are the brakes the same from a 1968 1600 to a 1969 2002?
-The brake Master Cyclinder looks different.
Is the exhaust downpipe and silencer the same? The manifold would be different I think.
Do they use the same solex diameter?

Thanks



Date: 12-12-05 04:15
From: Beaner7102 in Melbourne, Australia. View user's profile Send e-mail
Subject: Differences I've found

Early 1602 had single piston calipers (one brake line per wheel, not two) They have smaller drums on the back too. Dont know about the booster (they are the same on RHD cars). All 1602 dont have sway bars (front or rear). Solex 1bl down draft is the same as an 02. But both manifolds (inlet & outlet) have smaller diameter holes (smaller motor less flow needed). The diff should be a 4.11 (because of less power), but may have been changed (or could be a long neck version). All the rest is the same as far as I can tell. Good luck. Beaner7102
_________________
1971 - 2002 RHD VIN 1653940. Agave (stock with Pertronix & 32/36 Weber) - "Cactus"
1972 - 1602 RHD VIN 1554408. Fjord (with 2L motor, Weber 40/40 and 5speed - LSD to come) - "Bluey"



Date: 12-12-05 07:20
From: PeteinMissionViejo in Mission Viejo View user's profile Send e-mail
Subject: Re: rear sway bar

On my 68 1602 the front sway bar was a bolt on - mounts were there. I'm ready to change the rear subframe and the newer model one has the mount points for the sway bar. I'm not seeing the mount points on the trailing arms. Any experience adding those mount points on the trailing arms - or am I just not seeing them?

Pete



Date: 12-12-05 08:58
From: mike in Beavercreek, OH View user's profile Send e-mail
Subject: Re: 1600 and 2002 differences--answers

Do they have different suspension, or is it the same?--same except the 1600 doesn't have sway bars and the tii's have different front strut housings.

-I think they have different control arms. Nope, only the tii had different rear control arms.

Are the shocks interchangeable? Yep

Are the brakes the same from a 1968 1600 to a 1969 2002? No--all '68s have two piston calipers (1600 and 2002); 69's (again, both) have 4 piston calipers.

-The brake Master Cyclinder looks different. depends on the year and whether the 1600 had a power brake booster or not. All '02 had power brakes, but not all the (especially the early) 1600s.

Is the exhaust downpipe and silencer the same? The manifold would be different I think. 1600 and 2002 manifolds are different; stickshift, carbureted 1600s and 2002s use the same exhaust systems--down pipe, center muffler and rear muffler (except 75 and 76 rear mufflers with center exhaust pipe)

Do they use the same solex diameter? Nope--with 1 bbl Solexes, the 1600 uses a 38 PDST and the 2002 uses a 40 PDST
_________________
'69 Nevada sunroof--"Wolfgang"--bought new
'73 Sahara sunroof-- "Ludwig"--mine since '78
'87 eta E30 coupe--"Johannes"
+ Fiat Topolini (Benito & Luigi), Renault 4CVs (Anatole, Lucky Pierre, Brigette)...
and Kermit, the Bugeye Sprite



Date: 12-12-05 09:06
From: Beaner7102 in Melbourne, Australia. View user's profile Send e-mail
Subject: Re: rear sway bar

Sorry, I only got my 1602 a few weeks ago and havent started working on it. I know the fronts had the mounts ready to go. I assumed it was the same on the rear. My car is a 1972 RHD model so it may be different. Beaner7102
_________________
1971 - 2002 RHD VIN 1653940. Agave (stock with Pertronix & 32/36 Weber) - "Cactus"
1972 - 1602 RHD VIN 1554408. Fjord (with 2L motor, Weber 40/40 and 5speed - LSD to come) - "Bluey"



Date: 12-13-05 01:56
From: Slavs View user's profile Send e-mail
Subject: Re: 1600 and 2002 differences

Level of diffrence varies depending on the year.

1. The suspensions are the same. 1600s from 1966 - 68 lacked rear sway bar mounts on the subframe, although they can be easily attached. In 69 they equipped the 1600 with front and rear sway bars just like the 2002.

2. All 1600s (except the 1600ti) had smaller rear drums (200mm vs. the 230mm of 2002) The first couple hundred 2002s off the production line in 68 also had the smaller 200mm rear drums. The larger 230mm drums of the 02 were adopted from the 1600ti. 66-68 1600s used the earlier style remote brake booster. In 69 the 1600s were equipped with the more familier brake booster which first appeared on the 68 2002. The 68 2002 and 69 1600 use the same brake master with attached fluid reservoir. All 02s up until about mid 69 used single circuit and single piston brake calipers, identical on both 1600s and 2002s. In mid 69 both models received the 2 piston calipers.

3. Rear subframes on both models were designed for the longneck differential up until late 69. The 1600 used the 4.10 diff while the 2002 used the 3.64 ratio. Many other ratios were available if specially ordered. Some 1600ti's used the 3.90 longneck diff. In 1970 both cars were being equippped with the newer short neck diffs and corresponding subframes.

4. Driveshafts differed on the 2 models up until both models received the shortneck diffs sometime in 1970. From that year both models used the same driveshaft. All 1600s with longneck diffs used a unique driveshaft with a telescopic - slideing center section and no u-joints. These driveshafts used 3 6 hole guibos and corresponding 3 hole flanges on the tranny and diff. Longneck 2002s (1968-mid 69) used a similar driveshaft with the telescopic - sliding center section, but diffreing from the 1600 driveshat in that it used u-joints at midpoit and rear. Up front at tranny the 8 hole guibo with corresponding 4 hole flange on the tranny was incorporated. A 4 hole flange at the diff was also used. The switch to u-joints was done due to higher torque of the 2 liter motor.

5. Transmissions also diffred up until the factories switch to the shortneck diff in 1970. Prior to this year both cars used the smoother shifting Porsche-Synchroed trannies. The 2002 tranny, though, used a longer shift fork to clear the larger 8 hole guibo. You can use most trannies on a 1600 (given you also switch the flanges - all being of coarse splined design - some late 02 trannies were fine splined), but you can't use an early (66-69) 1600 tranny on a 2002 because the shorter shift fork can't clear the larger guibo. All trannies and driveshafts were standardized when the factory switched to the shortneck diff.

6. All 1600s and 2002s with the single piston calipers also used a unique inner front wheel bearing. This bearing has the same outside diameter as the later bearings, but the inner diameter is 2mm larger from the later style. The spindle at this inner point is 2mm beefier than later models.

7. The very early 1966-67 1600s used a different style muffler and resonator. In 68 they standardized the exhausts on both cars. Exhaust
and intake manifolds are different on both cars. The single barrel carbs differ in that the 1600 uses the 38mm butterfly while the 2002 uses the 40mm. Chokes and jets on the two single barrels aldo differ.

8. There are many cosmetic diffrences between the early and later cars.



Date: 12-13-05 01:58
From: Slavs View user's profile Send e-mail
Subject: Re: 1600 and 2002 differences

Level of diffrence varies depending on the year.

1. The suspensions are the same. 1600s from 1966 - 68 lacked rear sway bar mounts on the subframe, although they can be easily attached. In 69 they equipped the 1600 with front and rear sway bars just like the 2002.

2. All 1600s (except the 1600ti) had smaller rear drums (200mm vs. the 230mm of 2002) The first couple hundred 2002s off the production line in 68 also had the smaller 200mm rear drums. The larger 230mm drums of the 02 were adopted from the 1600ti. 66-68 1600s used the earlier style remote brake booster. In 69 the 1600s were equipped with the more familier brake booster which first appeared on the 68 2002. The 68 2002 and 69 1600 use the same brake master with attached fluid reservoir. All 02s up until about mid 69 used single circuit and single piston brake calipers, identical on both 1600s and 2002s. In mid 69 both models received the 2 piston calipers.

3. Rear subframes on both models were designed for the longneck differential up until late 69. The 1600 used the 4.10 diff while the 2002 used the 3.64 ratio. Many other ratios were available if specially ordered. Some 1600ti's used the 3.90 longneck diff. In 1970 both cars were being equippped with the newer short neck diffs and corresponding subframes.

4. Driveshafts differed on the 2 models up until both models received the shortneck diffs sometime in 1970. From that year both models used the same driveshaft. All 1600s with longneck diffs used a unique driveshaft with a telescopic - slideing center section and no u-joints. These driveshafts used 3 6 hole guibos and corresponding 3 hole flanges on the tranny and diff. Longneck 2002s (1968-mid 69) used a similar driveshaft with the telescopic - sliding center section, but diffreing from the 1600 driveshat in that it used u-joints at midpoit and rear. Up front at tranny the 8 hole guibo with corresponding 4 hole flange on the tranny was incorporated. A 4 hole flange at the diff was also used. The switch to u-joints was done due to higher torque of the 2 liter motor.

5. Transmissions also diffred up until the factories switch to the shortneck diff in 1970. Prior to this year both cars used the smoother shifting Porsche-Synchroed trannies. The 2002 tranny, though, used a longer shift fork to clear the larger 8 hole guibo. You can use most trannies on a 1600 (given you also switch the flanges - all being of coarse splined design - some late 02 trannies were fine splined), but you can't use an early (66-69) 1600 tranny on a 2002 because the shorter shift fork can't clear the larger guibo. All trannies and driveshafts were standardized when the factory switched to the shortneck diff.

6. All 1600s and 2002s with the single piston calipers also used a unique inner front wheel bearing. This bearing has the same outside diameter as the later bearings, but the inner diameter is 2mm larger from the later style. The spindle at this inner point is 2mm beefier than later models.

7. The very early 1966-67 1600s used a different style muffler and resonator. In 68 they standardized the exhausts on both cars. Exhaust
and intake manifolds are different on both cars. The single barrel carbs differ in that the 1600 uses the 38mm butterfly while the 2002 uses the 40mm. Chokes and jets on the two single barrels aldo differ.

8. There are many cosmetic diffrences between the early and later cars.



Date: 12-13-05 01:59
From: Slavs View user's profile Send e-mail
Subject: Re: 1600 and 2002 differences

Level of diffrence varies depending on the year.

1. The suspensions are the same. 1600s from 1966 - 68 lacked rear sway bar mounts on the subframe, although they can be easily attached. In 69 they equipped the 1600 with front and rear sway bars just like the 2002.

2. All 1600s (except the 1600ti) had smaller rear drums (200mm vs. the 230mm of 2002) The first couple hundred 2002s off the production line in 68 also had the smaller 200mm rear drums. The larger 230mm drums of the 02 were adopted from the 1600ti. 66-68 1600s used the earlier style remote brake booster. In 69 the 1600s were equipped with the more familier brake booster which first appeared on the 68 2002. The 68 2002 and 69 1600 use the same brake master with attached fluid reservoir. All 02s up until about mid 69 used single circuit and single piston brake calipers, identical on both 1600s and 2002s. In mid 69 both models received the 2 piston calipers.

3. Rear subframes on both models were designed for the longneck differential up until late 69. The 1600 used the 4.10 diff while the 2002 used the 3.64 ratio. Many other ratios were available if specially ordered. Some 1600ti's used the 3.90 longneck diff. In 1970 both cars were being equippped with the newer short neck diffs and corresponding subframes.

4. Driveshafts differed on the 2 models up until both models received the shortneck diffs sometime in 1970. From that year both models used the same driveshaft. All 1600s with longneck diffs used a unique driveshaft with a telescopic - slideing center section and no u-joints. These driveshafts used 3 6 hole guibos and corresponding 3 hole flanges on the tranny and diff. Longneck 2002s (1968-mid 69) used a similar driveshaft with the telescopic - sliding center section, but diffreing from the 1600 driveshat in that it used u-joints at midpoit and rear. Up front at tranny the 8 hole guibo with corresponding 4 hole flange on the tranny was incorporated. A 4 hole flange at the diff was also used. The switch to u-joints was done due to higher torque of the 2 liter motor.

5. Transmissions also diffred up until the factories switch to the shortneck diff in 1970. Prior to this year both cars used the smoother shifting Porsche-Synchroed trannies. The 2002 tranny, though, used a longer shift fork to clear the larger 8 hole guibo. You can use most trannies on a 1600 (given you also switch the flanges - all being of coarse splined design - some late 02 trannies were fine splined), but you can't use an early (66-69) 1600 tranny on a 2002 because the shorter shift fork can't clear the larger guibo. All trannies and driveshafts were standardized when the factory switched to the shortneck diff.

6. All 1600s and 2002s with the single piston calipers also used a unique inner front wheel bearing. This bearing has the same outside diameter as the later bearings, but the inner diameter is 2mm larger from the later style. The spindle at this inner point is 2mm beefier than later models.

7. The very early 1966-67 1600s used a different style muffler and resonator. In 68 they standardized the exhausts on both cars. Exhaust
and intake manifolds are different on both cars. The single barrel carbs differ in that the 1600 uses the 38mm butterfly while the 2002 uses the 40mm. Chokes and jets on the two single barrels aldo differ.

8. There are many cosmetic diffrences between the early and later cars.



Date: 12-13-05 09:18
From: FL02 in Central FL View user's profile Send e-mail
Subject: Re: 1600 and 2002 differences

Thanks everyone for all the good info, I really appreciate it. Your experience helps.



Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic       BMW 2002 FAQ Forum Index > General Discussion All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Threaded
Page 1 of 1

 
Forum HelpForum Help Forum SearchForum Search RegisterRegister Log inLog in