Date: 10-22-05 03:25 From: Fly2002Fly in or near Dallas Subject: Oh gawd, back to the headache.
Ouch is there an option to view the threads so they are not crammed like the old forum? _________________ '71 2002 "Bumblebee" '91 318is
Date: 10-22-05 03:31 From: mmccurdy in SF, CA Subject: Re: Oh gawd, back to the headache.
Fly2002Fly wrote:
Ouch is there an option to view the threads so they are not crammed like the old forum?
I can give them a bit more padding -- I was going for a happy medium (folks were complaining that there was too much space).
Date: 10-22-05 03:43 From: Fly2002Fly in or near Dallas Subject: Re: Oh gawd, back to the headache.
Maybe I got used to the space the way it was, but yes maybe just a titch more space would be great! Lines between may work if you need to save area, and I also understand ya can't make everyone happy. I congratulate you guys on the new site and I personally thank you for all your hard work!
P.S. If you like it better, keep it. I'll get used to it. You guys deserve to have it the way you like it! _________________ '71 2002 "Bumblebee" '91 318is
Date: 10-22-05 03:56 From: f1reverb Subject: The lines are fine with the revision, and it's . . .
still twice as airy in the line-spacing as it was on the old board. It doesn't feel cramped at all the way it is at the moment and has taken me from eight screens to view the GD page to three. More space would be a step backwards.
Date: 10-22-05 04:12 From: Fly2002Fly in or near Dallas Subject: Re: The lines are fine with the revision, and it's . . .
Yes, its really not to bad, and yes you can cover more ground. Hmm gimme some time I'll get used to it! Maybe it was all the (viewsXX/ReplysXX) at the end of the thread description, that at a first glance made it look more crammed than it really is. _________________ '71 2002 "Bumblebee" '91 318is
Last edited by Fly2002Fly on 10-22-05 04:17; edited 1 time in total
Date: 10-22-05 04:15 From: mmccurdy in SF, CA Subject: Re: The lines are fine with the revision, and it's . . .
Fly2002Fly wrote:
Yes, its really not to bad, and yes you can cover more ground. Hmm gimme some time I'll get used to it! I wonder if its possible to display the view/reply numbers of to the left, maybe its all the (viewsXX/ReplysXX) at the end of the thread description that makes it look more cluttered than it is.
Yeah, I actually liked being able to scan down the columns and at least see quickly how many replies the topics had. I'll tweak this a bit more some time soon... right now I'm working on fixing the jump menu and re-enabling threaded viewing.
Date: 10-22-05 04:33 From: Fly2002Fly in or near Dallas Subject: Re: The lines are fine with the revision, and it's . . .
mmccurdy wrote:
Fly2002Fly wrote:
Yes, its really not to bad, and yes you can cover more ground. Hmm gimme some time I'll get used to it! I wonder if its possible to display the view/reply numbers of to the left, maybe its all the (viewsXX/ReplysXX) at the end of the thread description that makes it look more cluttered than it is.
Yeah, I actually liked being able to scan down the columns and at least see quickly how many replies the topics had. I'll tweak this a bit more some time soon... right now I'm working on fixing the jump menu and re-enabling threaded viewing.
Forum Help
Forum Search
Register
Log in
